To push they're agenda unto Christians, liberal media have given Gay's a voice for they're anti Christian believe, and made Christian the evil people, now Gay's our mushing for the right to marriage, this is 4% of the population forcing a change unto the 96 % who our either Christian or anti gay, gay liberal judges over riding voters who voted against same sex marriage calling it discriminating against Gays. This is taking away the voice of Christians and is nothing more then pure Marxist Socialism.
44 comments
"They're" for their? "Our" presumably for "are"? "Mushing for the right to marriage?"
Anyone else hearing a voice in molases-thick drawl to go with these words?
"pure Marxist Socialism"? Sure red55bird, keep telling yourself that.
1) Go back to the first grade and work on your spelling and grammar.
2) Apparently you have no idea how democracy works, or that more heterosexual cisgender people are becoming more supportive of LGBTAPF rights, or that Christian does not automatically mean homophobic and/or transphobic.
If this isn't a Poe it's one of the dumbest people I've seen capable of forming an opinion.
In any case, no, gays aren't changing marriage for straight people. Duh.
liberal media have given Gay's a voice
And that of course is bad, because in a free democratic society nobody should have a voice of their own.
Oops, excuse me: "of they're own".
Considering about half the population now supports gay marriage, I think you need to double check your 96% claim.
Upon reading this all I could hear was the voice of Mushmouth from Fat Albert in my head.
"this is 4% of the population forcing a change unto the 96 %"
Actually it's more like 59% and 34% - you know that fascist idea of "majority rules".
"This is taking away the voice of Christians"
You can still spew your hatred, just don't expect anybody to talk to you.
"and is nothing more then pure Marxist Socialism."
1. How could anything be "more then [sic] pure"? Pure is 100%. Ever seen a water bottle with 110% water?
2. No it isn't. As much as I would agree with them on it, none of the classic Marxist thinkers were social liberals.
What, Marxist Socialism, they want to own everything in common, the way Jesus's followers did? They want to love each other as Jesus commanded his followers?
Seems to me they're more Christian than you are.
Please learn English before you start spouting nonsense on the Web.
No change whatsoever will come to straight marriage, dumbass! The only thing that is changing is that gays can also marry. So, it's 4 percent that will also have the rights that the 96 percent have taken for granted.
If you're the 96 percent, how the heck could you have your voice taken away?
Marxism and Socialism are related, yes, kinda like Liberalism and Conservatism are related, but they are not the same thing. Both Marxism and Socialism have something of the "To each according to his need, from each according to his abilities", that even Jesus talked about. But Marxism is a bit more to the left, and Socialism a bit more to the right.
...for they're anti Christian believe...
*sound of an English teacher sobbing in the distance*
This is taking away the voice of Christians and is nothing more then pure Marxist Socialism.
*sound of a history teacher sobbing in the distance*
"This is taking away the voice of Christians "
If they all think like you, we can only hope they will all get laryngitis.
Trust me, you are not old enough or ready enough for the internet, yet.
Or:-
Trust me, are you ever ready for the internet! That was hilarious! Just what basements and internets were made for.
@MK
"How do people like this manage to afford the money for an internet connection and a computer?"
My first response was "public libraries", but something tells me this guy has never been one to visit libraries.
So if Christians were 4% of the population it would be fine to deny them basic human rights and bar them from marriage and whatever else the majority decided? Got it.
Mushing for marriage... Sled dog racers for equality?
I might take you seriously if you could use proper grammar and spelling.
But the U.S. Constitution was designed to prevent tyranny of the 4% by the 96%. This is why "Gay's" are slowly getting the right to marry now.
"To push they're agenda..."
...aaaaand right from the start, you FAIL.
image
Winston Churchill was a prolific writer and author; his histories of the 20th Century are considered by academics and scholars to be amongst the finest of their kind.
And you don't win the Nobel Prize for Literature by using bad grammar/punctuation/spelling etc., therefore anything you say is invalid, never mind your initial argument, seeing as you cannot form a cogent thought in the first place.
The only "agenda" this liberal has is to push for better education in our school systems so that ass-hats like you can tell the difference between, "their," "there," and "they're" and "our," vs. "are."
Face it, you have no fucking credibility when you write like that.
Being or supporting gay isn't anti-Christian nor is it anti-Jewish. I know a ton of Christians and Jews who do not find it any of their business telling others who they are allowed to fall in love with.
"Christian" is not the same as "anti-gay" and there are a great many Christians who don't see same-sex marriage as the end of marriage or even an infringement on their rights. And 96% of the population isn't anti-gay, either. And as we're here, before you decry the Marxist Socialism of education, you might like to try some.
To push they're agenda unto athiests, christians violate church/state separation and push their religion into public schools, claiming their god has been "forced out of schools" and mushing their beliefs onto everyone else making athiests and non-christians the evil people, forcing a change onto them claiming the US is a "nation founded by christians" even though it wasn't. This is taking away the voice of athiests and non-christians and is nothing more then pure Marxist Socialism.
That's what you meant to say, isn't it?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.