No - the Paeolithic Man was one of three versions of man that were experimental predecessors to Adam. They did not have souls. This was "Research and Development".
62 comments
So God-the omnipotent and omniscient ruler and creator of the universe-had to make a test run. Wouldn't he have known what was going to happen?
Furthermore, how do you know they didn't have souls?
#1 ROFL FAIL
#2 [citation needed]
Your omnipotent, omniscient God sure is retarded, isn't he? He needed to have prototypes for humans, (since, obviously, he couldn't get it right from the outset) and yet we, being the supposed best version, are still rife with malfunction and strong drives towards physically and (according to your ideology) spiritually destructive behaviors? Your perfect God is incredibly skilled at making imperfect entities.
Because God knew, of course, exactly what would come of this "Research and Development", but he had to make the experiments anyway to confuse the heck out of the finished version.
If your god is infallible and all that, then he would not have had to have R&D prototype humans. So either he's perfect and his word is perfect or he works through trial and error, is fallible, and you guys are worshiping an asshole.
Strike that... either way he's an asshole.
Is the human species a work in progress, i.e. evolving? Perhaps the next time aoround, Sapient 3.0, it will come with an anti-virus software for a longer life before being replaced by the next generation.
I'm amazed. In order to avoid admitting that evolution might be fact, they get further and further away from the bible than any scientist could dream of.
This one's borderline on babbling about Xenu and thetans.
It should be in the very beginning of the bible, right? I couldn't find it!
Dang, I'll look again! This will keep me busy all day (nah, it won't)
Well, considering that this is the god who, according to one version of Genesis, forgot to create a female for his supposedly favoured species until Adam began screwing goats and sheeps (not to mention the whole Lilith fiasco), I can see how he'd need the practice, lots of it.
Just where in the Bible does it say that God made "experimental predecessors" to Adam?
Remember that verse about adding one "jot or tittle," Jimmy!
so if i want a license to pull 'facts' out of my ass, do i have to speak to a pastor directly or is their a number i can call?
also, if there were no women, why did God give Adam a dick, and all those organs whose sole purpose is to allow men to have sex with women?
Forgive me for not being completely up on my pseudo-Biblical lore, but where does the idea of Lilith even come from? I've come across the notion before, but I have never seen or heard it properly explained. I understand that there's a verse in Isaiah that is sometimes translated as "and there Lilith shall repose," but other translations simply make mention of a screech owl.
Certainly I do not accept biblical doctrine, as I believe more of it is fabricated than not, but I really do not see evidence of a "Lilith fiasco" according to the bible. Please, enlighten me.
Try this and see if it works.Trial and error, (scientific that) Makes sense,since God apparently wipes out all but eight humans and two of many unspecified (except all the animals we have today ) animals. He said "fuck it all" a lot by Biblical history.
Adam pissed him off too, but not nearly as much as Eve.
Your myths have no cohesion or purpose, Give it up
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.