[on falsifiability]
Evo's have stated time and time again here that the only "truths" they have are "truths" that can be proven false ....
huh ??
14 comments
This seems more like a simple misunderstanding than true fundie nuttiness (though, given the use of "evo", I'm certain he is a fundie and a nut).
This is wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. However, with two pieces of punctuation, and two additional words, it becomes correct:
Hey dprASSe,
Anyone want to know the real truth about dprASSe? He's about as far from God as one can get, so don't take his comments about God seriously.
Yes, so experiments can be made to see what reality (or Creation, if you wish) thinks of this truth. If Creation says 'wrong!', back to the drawing board the scientist goes.
That's why they're deemed falsifiable. So ideas and hypotheses can be tested.
“Evo's have stated time and time again here that the only "truths" they have are "truths" that can be proven false ....
huh ??”
What confuses you? Almost every cop program, they will progress for a whil e on the wrong idea. The wrong suspect. Once they find the evidence that the Butler was across town at the time of the murder, screwing the dead guy’s widow, they have falsified that idea.
Doesn’t mean ANY of the above if a mistruth, or a hoax, or a cover. Honest cops/doctors doing their job can make errors. SOmething, somewhere, will be evidence to disprove the error. But until we find it, it’s the best guess so far for the observations made.
Same way that waving Genesis and shouting GODDIDIT isn’t the way to falsify evolution.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
