[Commenting on an article critcal of the Creation Museum]
"...monument to ignorance and irrationality"? Creation, which is proven with every birth, is ignorant and irrational? Evolution has never been proven once and the amount of faith it takes to believe in it is staggering. The final statement appears to apply only to the author of those words.
33 comments
Creation, which is proven with every birth
So, during every pregnancy god comes down to earth to personally assemble the human being that finally comes out of the womb?
Well, why then don´t we find any signs of divine intervention at pregnancy, but rather see that everything happening at pregnancy ois the result of natural processes?
;)
"Creation, which is proven with every birth, is ignorant and irrational?"
You would have produced better analogy if you have gone with:
"Creation, which is proven with every person making a shit, is ignorant and irrational?"
but hey, it's a shitty thought anyway. /Puns
"Creation, which is proven with every birth, is ignorant and irrational?"
Absolutely. Goddiddit supercedes fossils every time.
Stop regurgitating your pastor's lines, Bryan. Makes you look bad.
The Creation "Museum" is wasting land we can use for a real museum.
I'll join the crowd in asking the question, how exactly does a birth "prove" your notion of "creation"?
As for the Creation Museum, why not consider it a bizarre art exhibit?... After all, not everything that claims to be something (serious science, in this case) has to be taken as such.
Creation, which is proven with every birth
That's actually called procreation and despite the name it's not an argument for creation.
Dear Bryan Potteiger,
Please stop pretending you know anything about evolution.
Sincerely,
On another note, I'm getting tired of this "there's no evidence for evolution" business. Mountains of evidence have been provided; you assholes just look at it and say "that's not evidence" and then move the standard yet again. And yet you continue to maintain that Creationism is "proven" without ONE SINGLE SOLITARY SHRED OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT. You can't have it both ways.
If it's such a valid and scientific place of learning, why does it have a room (possibly rooms, the videos I saw weren't that great) that criticizes everything not-fundie and has nothing to do with creation?
Creation is ignorant and irrational? Yes, next question. scientific theroy, that is validated, not proven. As new evidence and new ideas surface, the theory is revised and updated. The Theory of Evolution is evolving, all the time, just as Nature.
That which can not be questioned, can not be made better, it's stagnant, lifeless, outdated.
Genetic mutations, most of which are harmless are present at birth in every living thing. Beneficial ones may be advantageous over others- allowing some to survive more than others, thus natural selection. Therefore, evolution is proven at birth.
Let's ignore, for the moment, the fact that every birth is a testament to the evolutionary process.
Let's also ignore the mountains of corroborationg evidence to support evolutionary theory.
Let's even ignore the total absence of evidence in favour of the creationist fairytale.
Are you saying that your faith isn't as strong as an atheist's? 'Cos that's what it looks like to me.
@ Eden
Well, there is a recent fundie post calling a baby "parts".
Creation, which is proven with every birth
Evolution has never been proven once
Actually if we found babies in cabbage patches, or storks brought them, or if men actually planted a "seed" in a woman, those would be proof of creation. Sex doesn't prove anything other than, as Nathan said, somebody got fucked.
With birth, it also comes a cry from a baby which is seen nowhere else. So, sorry, births are a totally different field. Don't compare apples from pears.
It's completely stupid to think that we descended from ape-like beings through mutation and adaptation. It makes far more sense to believe that man was created from dirt, and woman created from man's rib.
Seriously, I'm kind of happy they wasted $27 million building a creation museum. At least that's money not spent trying to force religion into government. But if they were true Christians (not True ChristiansTM), they'd have given all that money to the poor.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
