Science isn't everything FYI. Science can't even prove this statement exists!
57 comments
Perhaps, in terms of philosophy. But if you're going to argue from that perspective, then you can't prove that Jebus exists, and you can't even prove your own existence. So STFU!
I see that statement, therefore it exists.
There, I just proved that that statement exists, and since I can prove it exists, I also proved that caseypowell is an idiot.
This somehow reminds me of this joke.
In a college class, there was a test with one question, and there was a chair on the table next to where the question was written. The question was, "Prove this chair does not exist." There was one person who passed, by saying, simply,"What chair?"
Which goes to show, PHILOSOPHY is what you're thinking of. Not science.
I bow to lytefoot for a most creative and impromptu use of the scientific method!
And science is everything, you silly fundie. Science explains nature. You are a part of nature, are you not? Science is a tool, and without it, you wouldn't have a flippin' computer in front of you.
"Science isn't everything FYI. Science can't even prove this statement exists!"
If science isn't everything, how did you post your bullshit caseypowell? How do you ensure that you won't die if you get a terrible affliction or injury that means you require surgery? What made the safe, clean, modern world you live in today?
Why aren't you living in a cave, wearing only animal furs, eating raw meat? (no cooking or keeping warm, naughty! Fire is an application of science too).
I think. Therefore you are... a twat.
@Random Guy
"Something I've heard from various places: Philosophy Teacher: *puts a chair up on a table* Prove that this chair does not exist. Best answer: "What chair?"
And I trust said philosophy teacher then replied 'What are you sitting on, then? Empty air? Do you constantly fart to kep yourself from falling? Does your arse have antigravity properties?'
This logic trainwreck began at the very top. Without any proof for their religion they borrowed this pseudo-philisophical argument that NOTHING can be proved. They moved the goalposts yet again by trying to change the meaning of proof.
Is that your Mercedes Reverand? Prove it
I can see your sentence on my screen (unfortunately), so i don't need scientists to prove it to me. But yes, i empirically and repeatedly stumbled upon this sentence, so i think we can scientifically declare, that it exists.
@ anon-e-moose
The /"what chair"/ scenario is an example of philosphy. There are people that believe that existence is subjective, that only if you belive it exists can you actually look at something and see it as existing. Science has nothing to do with it, even if the existence of fundies disproves survival of the fittest.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.