camel2on64 #fundie

camel2on64 #fundie gamespot.com

You cant have something from nothing; its a fundamental concept of science...

Law of Conservation of Mass states that matter is neither created nor deystroyed, only transferred.

EXPLAIN THAT, EVOLUTIONISTS! How was the universe created, then?

50 comments

old comment by A Friend

First, there was nothing. But then, something totally awesome had to be made. The awesomest thing ever has to be real, because it wouldn't be as awesome if it wasn't real.

So the first thing ever to exist had to be a wolf. The wolf made a dot, which couldn't contain infinite awesomeness like the wolf could, so it exploded into the universe (big bang) The wolf stayed outside of it, so it can't possibly be detected by any instrument within the universe. The wolf can cross in or out, but no other object can.

Also, the wolf made all the laws of physics after the fact. He still influences the universe. Anything that is totally awesome or sweet(ninjas, lasers, wolves(obviously), cats, Brock Sampson...), the wolf had a part in creating, either by making it himself, or pawing at the consciousness of whoever made it.

This is utterly unprovable, and nobody(myself included) has any basis to believe it. But it's fucking awesome, and that's reason enough. Your unprovable bullshit will never be a sweet as mine.

I have a 4-step proof of this, but it is beyond the scope of this post.

old comment by Tempus

As an interesting aside, the theory that the entire universe was once confined to a single dense point which expanded was originally developed from astronomical observations made by Georges Henri Joseph Éduard Lemaître, an astronomer, physicist and Catholic priest. And it was originally rejected by other scientists of the time, because it actually seemed to smack of Christian creationist dogma, and was accepted only very, very slowly.

There's a pretty good chance that you don't regard Catholics as Christian, of course, so I'm fairly certain it wouldn't faze you. Also, once again, you've conflated evolution with cosmology, when the two have nothing to do with each other beyond the fact that some scientists hold both views. A belief that living organisms share a common origin doesn't have anything to do with the fact that many physicists believe the universe expanded from a compressed state, and vice versa.

The fact that we evolved has not violated any physics and if it did we would not have evolved and would not have discovered that we did: we didn't invent that. But you also forgot that your idealistic doctrine would also need to apply to deities. There's an answer, however: humans imagined those. Thus, reality denial in favor of an imaginary world.

camel2on64 #fundie gamespot.com

50 comments

Confused?