Any television program, narrator, instructor or documentary that portrays dinosaurs living millions of years ago without a disclaimer? (a disclaimer saying they only are "guessing" about their details) should be prosecuted for sedition, subversion and other adjectives
The nonsense of the concept of millions of years old dinosaurs is part of the attack on civilization, part of the lie seeking to promote anarchy, lawlessness, debauchery, orgies, perversion, the ruin of marriage, the corruption of every good thing.
80 comments
What?! How do shows about dinosaurs promote all that?
This man is just asking for attention, and to get his ass kicked. This is his uptenth quote here in a week.
What anarchy, lawlessness, debauchery, orgies, perversion, the ruin of marriage, corruption have to do with dinosaurs?
Did dinosaurs have orgies too?
Ok, what if they have analised their bones, the amount of C14 radium and several other features and the result is that they're million years old?, is marriage and the integrity of state so fragile that a scientific discovery crumbles its fundation?
I hate to break it to you, but BradleyTS is right. The concept that anything in creation is millions of years old contradicts both Genesis creation accounts. If you think that Genesis is fictional or allegorical, what stops you from saying the same about "Thou shalt not kill"?
"contradicts the two genesis accounts" is pretty telling.
the bible contradicts ITSELF, it doesn't even need science to be wrong
Are you sure it's the dinosaurs that lead to "anarchy, lawlessness, debauchery, orgies, perversion, the ruin of marriage, the corruption of every good thing"? I thought it was teh gays.
PS. Please note: Other than the fundy quote, this comment is free of adjectives. I wouldn't want to be prosecuted for adjectives. (Adverbs are a different matter.)
Do your family members know of the shit that's festering in your head, Brad? Do you need a catheter?
Sedition and subversion are not adjectives. Try "seditious" and "suvbersive".
Sixty-five million years, bitch. Sixty-five million years. No guesses here. No disclaimer necessary...the ignorant are perfectly capable of saying "uh-UNH" for themselves.
Really, though, come up with another shtick. Trying to link dinosaurs with the sexual traditions of the human race is, you know, very shaky.
Any television program, narrator, instructor or documentary that portrays dinosaurs living millions of years ago without a disclaimer? (a disclaimer saying they only are "guessing" about their details) should be prosecuted for sedition, subversion and other adjectives
By that standard, FOX News should be "prosecuted for sedition, subversion and other adjectives" for not running a disclaimer indicating that they are not an actual news source.
-pb
I hate to break it to you, but BradleyTS is right. The concept that anything in creation is millions of years old contradicts both Genesis creation accounts. If you think that Genesis is fictional or allegorical, what stops you from saying the same about "Thou shalt not kill"?
Aww, does someone want the attention of the main page? So CUTE!
-pb
Where are these debauched orgies? You brickheads keep promising me debauched orgies!
Marriage is a self-ruining institution. Just ask half of the people that have tried it and chose divorce over mayhem or suicide. To suggest it needs help from the dinosaurs in this regard is worthy of commitment to a mental institution. In other words (small ones that you will understand),
SHUT THE FUCK UP MORON, YOU'RE LEAKING STUPID ALL OVER THE PLACE!
You're looking really, really hard in all the wrong places to explain why you are an angry, paranoid moron whose life must totally suck. Sorry, but everything I've ever read by you is wrong.
"Any television program, narrator, instructor or documentary that portrays the bible
Fixed.
... yes. that's right. DINOSAURS are the leading cause of divorce.
As opposed to, ya know, MARRIAGE.
Isaac:
Ignoring "Thou shalt not kill" is not conducive to the survival of the species. It's called group selection, and though admittedly it's a fairly recent addition to the evolution knowledge base, it explains a lot about the existence of morality.
Dear Bradley and Isaac,
If all the evidence (and I do mean ALL the evidence) points to one answer, and all you have is one inaccurate and unscientific source written by people who knew nothing of the age of the world, etc., doesn't it stand to reason that the evidence must be correct and your source is in error? Intellectual honesty demands that you accept the evidential proof and reject the errors of your source.
The corruption of everything good, oh no! Not peanut butter!
@BradleyTS
... should be prosecuted for sedition, subversion and other adjectives Hey grammar guy, sedition and subversion are nouns. Prosecute any adjectives lately?
a disclaimer saying they only are "guessing" about their details
They're not guessing. They have good, logical explanations for their assertions. The explanations have been published for all to see. They have never been countered with anything other than ad hoc, unsupported "what-ifs" based on arguments from ignorance. The fact that a handful of loonies disagree with them and invent stuff out of thin air to support their harebrained theories doesn't mean everyone needs to give them equal time. Should the disclaimer also say that dinosaur fossils may have been planted there by the Flying Spaghetti Monster to keep scientists occupied? It has as much rational support as anything offered by the Kent Hovinds of the world.
Prosecuted for 'other adjectives'?
What for? Using adjectives without a license?
Not to mention that his list was comprised of nouns, not adjectives.
And I had no idea that dinosaurs had such a radical agenda...
Any television program, narrator, instructor or documentary that portrays dinosaurs living millions of years ago without a disclaimer? (a disclaimer saying they only are "guessing" about their details) should be prosecuted for sedition, subversion and other adjectives
Errr...because they can produce sufficient evidence to show it as a valid theory? Let's see your Bible do the same.
"The nonsense of the concept of millions of years old dinosaurs is part of the attack on civilization, part of the lie seeking to promote anarchy, lawlessness, debauchery, orgies, perversion, the ruin of marriage, the corruption of every good thing."
WTF? I don't even......oh nevermind.
My dictionary defines sedition as "incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government," although I usually hear people use it to mean just general criticism, which is not a crime. Ironically, in Random House Webster's Dictionary, it comes right after sediment, which is where most fossils are found and how we know how old they are.
"Any"
...and right from the starting gate does Brad's argument go flat on it's face at Step 0, then fall straight down into the Pit of FAIL and is fa(i)l(l)ing to this day.
Sir David Attenborough, the king of the 'Event'* Documentary, especially his "Life" series by the BBC.
BBC: British Broadcasting Corporation.
Now, even if [/Spartan Laconic Wit] you could potentially take to court a TV company/channel (not taking into account the 1st Amendment/FCC rules etc), how the fuck are you going to do that in a country where the US Constitution has no jurisdiction whatsoever?!
"Life on Earth": 1976. "First Life" (on Evolution): 2010. Nope, no anarchy, lawlessness etc here in the UK.
'The BradleyTSodon Argumentis. It is... like all other dinosaurs... extinct. ' [/David Attenborough] X3
*- Right from his first, "Life on Earth" in the 1970s, all his documentary series have been 'Events', ratings & awards-wise. And I wonder [i]why[/i] he was awarded his Knighthood eh, Brad...?!
"They've a temper some of them- particularly verbs: they're the proudest- adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs- however, I can manage the whole lot of them! Impenetrability! That's what I say!"
- Humpty Dumpty, (who, incidentally, understood reality far better than BradleyTS)
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
