“If Evolution is true, then why only females can give birth?”
That’s what ‘female’ fucking MEANS, genius. WAY way back in the past, some mutation provided for specialization which included the egg-making part and the sperm-making part. It kinda caught on.
“Female mammals give birth.”
As per the definition, yes.
“They say species pass on genes to ensure the survival of their kind.....”
No, ‘kind’ is a religious term. We say ‘survival of the species.’
“so is it not faster and better if both gender can give birth instead of just one??”
THere are species where all the members possess the traits of both genders. That’s the path they ended up on. But as long as you’re using terms like ‘both genders’ that precludes males giving birth.
“If both can give birth, then genes are passed to a faster rate”
How the fuck do you figure THAT?
Someone DID tell you that the kids females give birth to HAVE the genes of the father, right? RIGHT? Tell me you know this. LIE ifyou must, but tell me….
“and it could also improve the survival rate of the species.”
No, it really wouldn’t. Pretty sure men giving birth would bring reproduction to a whiny, trembling, HALT. We’re not that tough.
“Many species faced extinction so why didn't they evolved to have male species to give birth?”
What in the name of fuck is a ‘male species?’
Are you just too stupid to even ask questions on this?
My instructor at Instructor school SWORE there were no dumb questions, but i’d like to slep him in the face with your post.
“But this will never happen because God designed only a female can give birth!! (Genesis chapter)”
Still, gotta ask what a male species is.
“Really, it is sad for someone to ignore the creator Jesus Christ.”
It’s sad when cousins marry, but here you are.
“If you think evolution is true, then can you explain why only the female gender can reproduce??”
Yes.
Not going to waste the photons, but yes.
