Jim #fundie

Jim #fundie blog.reaction.la

He is most certainly meant to polygynous. We are descended from far more women than men, indicating that among our ancestors most men failed to reproduce, and a few men reproduced massively.

Civilization requires patriarchy and monogamy, but any argument for monogamy presupposes patriarchy, that women are owned by their fathers, who transfer ownership to husbands. If fertile age women are allowed to wander round fucking who they please, they all fuck Jeremy Meeks – and if Jeremy Meeks is too busy to fuck them, they fuck Jian Ghomeshi. If you emancipate women, Jeremy Meeks gets most of the pussy, and nice guys get used up burned out thirty year olds.

For monogamy to exist, it has to be forcefully and coercively imposed on women. Women have submit.

Monogamy should be understood as a system of rationing to deal with the shortages that result from price controlling pussy.

Monogamy is a part of a deal between fighting men, where each man who is willing to work and fight gets at least one women, men disinclined to work or fight get kicked out, and women are not consulted about the deal.

13 comments

old comment by Gabriel LaVedier

These comments from MRAs are just getting more and more bizarre. And I see through them like cellophane, because while I may be intelligent, circumstances have put me in the lower middle class all my life. I see regular people, all of the time. Relationships are not about beautiful people having elaborate sex games and shit testing. It's about ordinary-looking people with ordinary working-class lives in love. They couldn't tell you what an alpha is or what cuck or Char or cock-carousels are (huh, lots of Cs. Are MRAs too stupid to use more letters?)

So, this angry socialist wants you to go fuck yourself. You do not speak for all men, you barely speak for yourself. My grandfather was a very old school gentleman, a union man who roiled hard with his hands. His wife was a helper and a force of her own. If the cancers hadn't taken him and someone translated this into Spanish he would cave your fucking skull in with his heavy construction tools.

old comment by Swede

Each person is descended from two people; one man and one woman. For a woman it takes nine months, plus about a year for breastfeeding/bottle-feeding, to produce a child. For a man it takes a few minutes. Men can therefore be "pregnant" with several women at once. To be successful (i.e. to have children who survive to have children of their own), the men still have to restrict the number of women and children to what they can afford to feed and house.

More males are born, but there are more females living past the age of five. The male organism is more frail than the female, having just a tiny piece of the second gender chromosome. Many boys fail to live to fertile age, in other words.

Religion requires patriarchy and monogamy. Civilization functions with matriarchy and polygamy as well.
Monogamy might just as well be men owned by their mothers and wives.

Who's Jeremy Meeks? He sounds like a bore. That Ghomeshi dude seems really creepy, he ought to be in jail.
It seems like the MRA dolts are a strong case of Shiny Mirror Syndrome; if they had the chance, they'd f**k their brains out, constantly. They think women do have the chance, so they must be f**king constantly. Right? Meanwhile forgetting that just as there are women who don't see them, there are women who THEY don't see.

Decent guys are the norm, nitwit. You know; men who treat women as human beings instead of life-support-systems for pussies. Decent guys get most women, as most women like to be seen as human beings. So called "nice guys" (the ones who just see walking vaginas for sale), don't get any; see previous sentences for reason.

We have mostly monogamy in Sweden, as in stable relationships between two people. People here live together for years and years, perhaps gettin married when they have their third child and realize that inheritance laws are easer when you're married. In other words, women are freely and happily living with the same men for decades. No force, no coercion, no submitting. Single women can get donor sperm and be moms on their own, and society doesn't really care.

Price controlling pussy? That doesn't make sense, neither grammatically nor socially.
Again, there are more women than men, the shortage is on men.

If fighting men want to form a deal, they have to make it so that a fighting man gets at least one man.
Women want to decide for ourselves who to share a life with. We know best who we've fallen in love with.

old comment by darkevilme

You know looking at the comments I have to point out.

MRA's advocate for men's rights.
Incels, neo-traditionalists also advocate for men's rights. But the similarities end there as if you describe their ideal worlds you get different results.

The MRA ideal world is egalitarian, where men's issues are treated equally to womens issues.

the neo traditionalist ideal world resembles the mongol bloody horde under ghenghis khan.

the incel ideal world...resembles a hentai and a poorly written one at that.

the point is lumping them together is just a way of dismissing the more reasonable concerns held by the more reasonable group by lumping them together with others.

It's intellectually lazy. This guy is a neo-traditionalist. it's not the same as an MRA.

Also I strongly suspect even the mongol horde didn't work the way the OP is describing.

old comment by darkevilme

@The Mimic Octopus:

I freely accept that. But lets face it. all movements seem to succumb to having radical elements sneak in.

But that shouldn't invalidate all their points. just the ones that are nonsense.
there are legitimate grievances in the MRA positions involving child custody, male suicide, opposing the radfem war on masculinity and etc.

Just as there are legitimate feminist positions, mainly involving the religious taking a sick delight in oppressing them (the republican war on choice, the state of women in most of the middle east)

Sure there's less legitimate feminist positions on the list and they mostly refer to the third world. But that's cause feminism has been so successful in the first world they've won most of their genuine struggles for liberation.

the MRA hasn't been successful cause grubby shits like this are considered the face of the movement by the general public and they're vilified, harassed and bullied whenever they try to do anything.