Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God exists and anybody who denies that evidence is mentally deranged, insane and psychotic. That is not a hate-filled statement. That is simply stating the only logical conclusion that one can render from analyzing atheist.
50 comments
Fuck you, you idiotic cuntbag!
Oh, by the way, that's not a hate-filled statement, I'm simply stating the only logical conclusion that one can render from your ramblings.
Then you could also conclude that if this is indeed true, your god makes people atheist, since nobody can choose to be "deranged, insane and psychotic".
mentally deranged, insane and psychotic.
...and crazy, and just plain nutz, too, I bet.
Sez you.
Prove beyond a shadow of a doubt? Not hardly. Why is it that Christians always claim that there's this hard, factual, obvious evidence for God's existence but never show it? Why is it that you have to believe in God before you can see the evidence of his existence?
"Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not exist and anybody who denies that evidence is mentally deranged, insane and psychotic. That is not a hate-filled statement. That is simply stating the only logical conclusion that one can render from analyzing Christians."
"Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God exists"
Oh, you were talking about the babble... that doesn't count.
"Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God exists..."
Strange, then, that no one, no where and at no time has ever been able to provide this "evidence", don't you think?
"...and anybody who denies that evidence is mentally deranged, insane and psychotic."
Projection, pure and simple.
"That is not a hate-filled statement."
Now you're lying - religion and hate go hand-in-hand.
"That is simply stating the only logical conclusion that one can render from analyzing atheist."
You wouldn't know logic if it bit you on the face.
Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God exists
So, where is this logical, analytical and cosmological evidence?
Since the evidence is logical, analytical and cosmological, I want to see the numbers. Where is the evidence, genius?
On the one hand I have a collection of theories and evidence that can explain nearly all the observable phenomena of the universe without recourse to supernatural father-figures. It has a few unknowns, and some quite sizable bits are still a little fuzzy, but what little I have works.
On the other hand you have a collection of stories and beliefs that can explain everything by invoking an invisible magical being that can break any rule on a whim in order to "advance the plot." There are no gaps to be sure, but it has zero explanatory power, predicts very little, and what it does predict is not borne out by experiment or observation.
One consists of a finite system of rules and variable that allows you to do everything from build spacecraft to save premature babies.
The other invokes an infinitely powerful, infinitely knowledgeable, and therefore infinitely complex, god and instructs you to stare dumbly at the heavens in awe of this unseen being's power and piteously beg him for the life of your child.
Choices, choices...
Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Allah exists and anybody who denies that evidence is mentally deranged, insane and psychotic. That is not a hate-filled statement. That is simply stating the only logical conclusion that one can render from analyzing infidel.
Fixed.
"Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God exists and anybody who denies that evidence is mentally deranged, insane and psychotic."
You wouldn't be posting this from the South Saint Paul psychiatric ward, would you?
"That is not a hate-filled statement."
No. It's an ignorance filled statement.
"That is simply stating the only logical conclusion that one can render from analyzing atheist."
I see the men in white coats nabbed you with the butterfly net in mid sentence. It's good to see they don't tolerate their patients posting bizarre rantings on the internet.
I don't follow you in the end there. Do you mean "from an analyzing atheist" or "from analyzing atheists".
What am I saying? I don't follow you from the start, through the middle, or in the end. Please provide all that evidence and put it in front of a peer reveiw board, please.
What is "analytical" or "logical" evidence? These are not empirical methods. They are ways of processing evidence, not yielding it. This guy is out of his depth and should be ignored--one wouldn't argue with a raving schizophrenic on a street corner, would he?
I'm on all of your sides--but your rhetoric mirrors his (even if yours is more coherent and factually grounded). Hyperbole reigns.
"Everything that can be said can be said clearly--over everything else, we must pass in silence." Maybe the inarticulate rage statements like these arouse in people like us should be passed over in silence. That is, unless the speaker is in a position of power over others.
What is "analytical" or "logical" evidence? These are not empirical methods. They are ways of processing evidence, not yielding it. This guy is out of his depth and should be ignored--one wouldn't argue with a raving schizophrenic on a street corner, would he?
I'm on all of your sides--but your rhetoric mirrors his (even if yours is more coherent and factually grounded). Hyperbole reigns.
"Everything that can be said can be said clearly--over everything else, we must pass in silence." Maybe the inarticulate rage statements like these arouse in people like us should be passed over in silence. That is, unless the speaker is in a position of power over others.
Well then, just provide that evidence.
Hint: a book, any book, is hearsay, not evidence.
You people keep going on about this evidence, yet it's not there.
BTW, talking to invisible friends is a symptom of being psychotic, that would be you sweetpea.
Then again, this may very well be my last counsellor. Nothing like realizing the guy you're going to for help is crazier than you.
anybody who denies that evidence is mentally deranged, insane and psychotic.
Boy, is that convincing - the old "you're a stupid poopy-head and so's your mother" argument.
Logical, analytical and cosmological evidence prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Christianity is bullshit and anybody who denies that evidence is mentally deranged, insane and psychotic. This is not a hate-filled statement. this is simply stating only logical conclusion that one can render from analyizing Christians.
Fixed.
"Logical, analytical and cosmological" evidence don't cut it.
We want forensic evidence. For example, find the garden of Eden and the patch of dirt where god supposedly cooked up Adam and Lilith. There's no question in my mind that chemists and nuclear physicists would find some interesting shit in that place.
Until you show us the garden, you have no evidence.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
