Timothy Fellows #fundie

Timothy Fellows #fundie cseblogs.com

In evolution, there is no law, and there are no laws. The only law is that there is no law. The only law is to expect change. For there to be Law, there must be a Lawgiver, and a Lawgiver can only enforce the law under his own jurisdiction, therefore requiring the necessity of Creation. An evolutionist who believes in law is like a sober drunk, or an honest crook.

How many billions of years ago did 2+2 gradually = 4?

How many billions of years ago did a circle gradually get 360 degrees?

How many billions of years ago did water become wet, or did fire become hot?

How many billions of years ago did a straight line become the shortest distance between two points?

When did water begin to freeze at 32 degrees (F) and boil at 212 degrees (F)?

When did the gradual become the constant?

When will evolutionists stop pretending to be scientists?

87 comments

old comment by James

You are in incredible tool.

You seem to be confusing two separate definitions of the word law. To quote the Compact Oxford English Dictionary:
"law

noun 1 a rule or system of rules recognized by a country or community as regulating the actions of its members and enforced by the imposition of penalties. 2 such rules as a subject of study or as the basis of the legal profession. 3 statute law and the common law. 4 a statement of fact to the effect that a particular natural or scientific phenomenon always occurs if certain conditions are present. 5 a rule defining correct procedure or behaviour in a sport. 6 something having binding force or effect: his word was law. 7 (the law) informal the police."
So you see, 'law' as in a system of justice is a completely separate thing to the word 'law' as in 'an inverse-square law'. In the English language we call these words 'homonyms'.

Everything in mathematics is defined by human beings.

Wet and hot are adjectives we invented to describe water and fire, not the other way around.

Water has always froze and boiled when it does today, since water molecules, like everything else, are subject to the laws of electromagnetism, which do not change.

There is no such thing as 'a gradual'. Gradually changing functions become constant as the variable approaches the number at which the gradual equates the given constant, mathematically speaking, i.e. the limit of the function 1/x approaches 1 as x approaches 1.

Evolutionists are scientists. Evolution is subject to a number of laws, such as the laws of biology and physics. No silicon based lifeform will evolve on this planet because the physical conditions makes complex silicon molecules unstable. Specific codons in a DNA sequence which always correspond to the same amino acids, etc..

old comment by Razark

"How many billions of years ago did 2+2 gradually = 4?"

2+2=5. The Party told me so.

"How many billions of years ago did a circle gradually get 360 degrees?"

No no no. A circle is 2 pi radians.

"How many billions of years ago did water become wet, or did fire become hot?"

Once the Great Old Ones figured out it worked better than water being hot and fire being wet.

"How many billions of years ago did a straight line become the shortest distance between two points?"

Great circle routes prove you wrong.

"When did water begin to freeze at 32 degrees (F) and boil at 212 degrees (F)?"

When we hit sea level.

"When did the gradual become the constant?"

When the stars were properly aligned.

"When will evolutionists stop pretending to be scientists?"

See, the Evolutionists _are_ scientists. It's the creationists who are pretending.

old comment by flipper

Great I love it, can two play?
When did snakes talk?
Where did Cain's wife come from?
When was pi value 3.0?
When did insects have 4 legs?
When was a bat a bird?
What happened to the unicorns?
How could orthodox Jews have a blasphemy trial on the Sabbath?
Why does "thou shall not kill" not apply to Christians and Jews in war?
Why does the "one wife to the customer" rule not apply to Old Testament Jewish Kings?
Why do fundies constantly misquote the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and most of the Founding Fathers writings on the Christian religion?
Why do fundies quote Paul and Old Testament about nine times for every once that they quote Christ, then say they are the only true CHRISTians?

old comment by

This is quite terrifying. Some responses have treated Timothy's questions as though they expect and deserve an answer: others have taken the easy road and pronounced him monumentally stupid. It's much worse than that: I have him down as reasonably bright but totally deranged, and utterly let down by those responsible for his education. What's the betting he's been home-schooled?

Here is a man so imprisoned by his own certainty that he has abandoned any attempt to understand any movement of thought that might call it into question. His mates quite possibly think this is a smart little put-own of those oh so arrogant evolutionists, and have patted him on the back for posting it. Poor Timothy, he's a lost soul. I hope someone rescues him.

old comment by Tempus

How many billions of years ago did 2+2 gradually = 4?

How many billions of years ago did a circle gradually get 360 degrees?

How many billions of years ago did water become wet, or did fire become hot?

How many billions of years ago did a straight line become the shortest distance between two points?

When did water begin to freeze at 32 degrees (F) and boil at 212 degrees (F)?

At an infinitesimally tiny, tiny fraction of an instant after the universe came into being, when the fundamental physical constants of space and time were set.

But "evolution" has exactly jack and shit to say about the origins of space and time, the four known fundamental forces or how the value of the known physical constants came to be set at their current measured values, so you'll need to go and ask a physicist. After all, you wouldn't ask a vulcanologist to explain how chlorophyll works--you'd go to someone who actually studies plants, a botanist.

But then, I'm sure you already knew that.

“In evolution, there is no law, and there are no laws. The only law is that there is no law. The only law is to expect change.”
You’ve listed two laws in a system with no laws.You wanna go out and come in again?

“For there to be Law, there must be a Lawgiver, and a Lawgiver can only enforce the law under his own jurisdiction, therefore requiring the necessity of Creation. An evolutionist who believes in law is like a sober drunk, or an honest crook.”
I believe that’s a load of horseshit. Nowhere in scripture does God provide a basis for freedom of religion. Yet that’s the law of the land, here. So the need for a lawgiver does not support creationism.

“How many billions of years ago did 2+2 gradually = 4?”
Math is a human invention. We don’t need any gods to count.

“How many billions of years ago did a circle gradually get 360 degrees?”
Geometry is a subset of math, so stil a human invention.

“How many billions of years ago did water become wet, or did fire become hot?”
Water isn’t wet. Things with excess watera are wet. Wet water would be ‘water with more water.’ Or ‘Water.’
SO, ‘wet’ is a human invention to describe extra water.
Not a revelation from God.
‘Hot’ is a relative term, another human invention. Subjective.

“How many billions of years ago did a straight line become the shortest distance between two points?”
That’s geometry, already covered.

“When did water begin to freeze at 32 degrees (F) and boil at 212 degrees (F)?”
Thursday. It was on al the networks.

“When did the gradual become the constant?”
Do you have any reason to think that any ‘constant’ was ever a variable?

“When will evolutionists stop pretending to be scientists?”
When you learn what science actually is, maybe/

Timothy Fellows #fundie cseblogs.com

87 comments

Confused?