Here’s a word to the wise..The natural order of things is that men are supposed to be in a dominant state over women. If you upset this order, it causes misery—for both men and women.
Here’s what feminism doesn’t tell you. Female hypergamy doesn’t disappear simply because society has decided male and female are “equal”. And what is hypergamy? For those of you who are unfamiliar with this term, ignore it at yout own peril! It is the primal female desire for a male mate who is taller, stronger, and generally superior to her in many respects, including earning ability. So let us pause and think about this for a moment—.females have this preordained biological preference for gender immutable inequality. Yet society blindly heads toward gender equality. You don’t think there is a problem with?
Believe me, it cause lots of problems. Our own IR disparity issue is in large measure white male reaction to white women’s feminism.
Any man who supports feminism is a damned fool.
35 comments
Swede (forgot to log in)
WHY are men supposed to be in a dominant state over women?
So, men aren't looking for a partner that is more sexy, beautiful and generally superior? ALL mating species have this preordained biological preference for getting the best possible genes for one’s offspring, stupid!
Gender equality means that men and women ought to have the same opportunities, responsibilities and rights.
Any man who supports equality is an intelligent and prosperous man, because DAMN; it's sexy with men who're secure in themselves, and don’t need to “prove themselves” all the time!
Male dominance prevents misery?
I'm sure slavery of foreign peoples is the natural balance too, right??
(*watches Ko-duck-sin's head asplode*)
We ALL want superior mates. I've always wanted someone who is smarter and better looking than I am. I want my children to have the best genes. That's just the way all life works. So yeah, women want strong, handsome men and men want beautiful, capable women.
"The natural order of things is that men are supposed to be in a dominant state over women. If you upset this order, it causes misery
for both men and women."
Because everybody knows all women love and need to be dominated by men, even $hitheaded men like you.
When you are taught as a youngster that you are an automatic arsehole wonder overlord numpty jerk by virtue of being a male, you have no need of learning or maturing.
See how he dominates the basement from his vantage point in front of the laptop! See how his mighty fists pound the keyboard in frustrated anger! See how his fearsome mother sprays the air freshener into the putrid atmosphere of the basement in a vain attempt to dispel the smell of rancid farts and stale semen!
Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith:
image
Queen Elizabeth I ring any bells? Boudica...?
That is all.
Kobukson: "The natural order of things is that men are supposed to be in a dominant state over women."
Skeptic: "How do you know that?"
Kobukson, in a "let me explain this to you like you're 5 years old" voice: "Because; by that order, I'M among the ones getting the long end of the stick!"
Human beings do not, and have never, worked that way. Quit making shit up to fit your fucked up misogynist fantasies.
Like men never want a woman who's "out of their league." And like women need men in charge to make sure they "lower their standards" or whatever nonsense.
Any man who doesn't support feminism is a dick. And also damn foolish.
You know, my school's Feminist Club has a more even male-female ratio than our Computer Science class. It's probably because men don't like being shoehorned into restrictive gender roles any more than women do. Another possibility is that it makes people feel good to support good causes, even if they personally don't benefit from them. Men have plenty of good reasons to be feminists.
Passerby
I keep hearing about this "hypergamy" bullshit like I'm supposed to know what it means. From the terms monogamy and polygamy which refer to long-term committed relationships in the singular and plural respectively and hyper typically meaning fast or excessive being slapped together made the word seemingly nonsensical. Rapidfire marriages? Wouldn't that imply short-lived relationships or shallow attractions making -amory the more sensible suffix and the bitching about women who wait too long to get married contradictory? Yet, now that someone has explained it as being something else entirely I'm even more confused.
Aren't you the egotistical fucks that insist women should aspire to nothing more out of life than the best husband and pretty themselves up for selection? Yet here you explicitly call that a bad thing. And if women are still just out for the best man then what exactly changes by having them in the workforce?
Afraid you can no longer hedge your bets by just buying a 14 year old from her father like "the good old days" or something? If it's really the natural order for men to just be better than women and for women to gravitate towards a better man then you'd have nothing to worry about. But it isn't is it? And in the repressed corners of your mind you know it and your precarious place in both genders' pecking order, don't you?
Edit: Bugger all, forgot to sign in.
Any man who supports feminism is a decent and intelligent man. The girls don't shun you because of your mythical "hypergamy", they shun you because you're an insecure, misogynistic, controlling asshole. Y chromosomes or double X chromosomes should never justify inequality. Men and women SHOULD be equal...because a Y chromosome=/=superiority
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.