In part 1 of this thread, i murdered atheism as its believers couldnot defend only one out of six points raised.
No, you didn't.
(1)Opposite of God is devil, anyone who doesnt believe God automatically believe devil
Belief in God automatically means belief in Satan. God acknowledges his existence and vice versa. So belief in either one is belief in the other one. And disbelief in one is disbelief in the other.
What you mean is that people who don't believe in God, worship Satan. In which case, where does that logic come from?
2) Atheism believers want also to win argument but not to esterblish truth and fact
No. There's so much wrong here. Atheists are not believers in anything. Hence they're atheists. And since we're not a hive mind of unbelievers, you can't shoehorn us into any category. Many atheists seek truth. In fact, they seek truth and evidence in various things that many theists don't, since many questions get answered as 'God' or 'beyond the understanding of humans'. Creationism is nothing but religion trying to destroy the search for truth.
3)They are unstable like water, instead to accept defeat in an argument, they will bring up another topic to cover up the former
I'm sure there are those who will not accept being wrong. We are human. But many of us I'm sure can accept when we're wrong on something. That'd how we stopped believing in the first place. You, however, I'd bet are unwilling to accept defeat.
4) No matter what you quote from the religion books that are known worldwide they will not accept but they want you to accept whatever they quote from the occultic books known by no one
That's because you're quoting from a religious book. We don't believe in said religious book. It would be like a fictional atheist quoting an 'atheist handbook', saying that "God does not exist", and expecting you, a Christian, to accept that. You wouldn't, because you don't accept the premise.
5) When they cant defend belief in an argument instead to chiken out, they will result in abusive words to cover up their defeat
Some get annoyed. Some probably too quick. Some get irritated because of talking in circles and blatant hypocrisy. I've never chickened out. Only backed away when death threats started.
6)They go as far as editing, manipulating history of some events and personalities to win at all cost
Huh? So there's a giant conspiracy? Can you provide examples?
7)They write lenghened essay as a response to a simple question like "why do you believe in atheism"
Because providing more information apart from "because", is bad? Usually, explaining your position in detail allows for better communication and debate.
