Evolutionists are expert tapdancers, as is obvious here in this forum. Think about all the people who dedicated there careers to proving evolution. Are they so willing to walk away from it? What would it take?
9 comments
"Think about all the people who dedicated there(sic) careers to proving evolution."
Think about all the people who dedicated their careers to teaching English. Never met one have you? Bet you never met a biology teacher either.
A rabbit fossil in the pre-Cambrian layer should do it.
A dog giving birth to a cat (or vice-versa) would also disprove evolution.
A monkey suddenly turning into a human, oh I don't think that the theory of evolution could survive such an event in its present form.
The fact is there are LOTS of theoretical things that would cause all scientists everywhere to walk away form evolution. The thing is, none of them have ever happened, and there is no reason to think that they ever will. Funny that.
*tap, tap, tappity, tap*
Woah, I didn't know I could do that, wow, whodathunk? Now here's my counter-statistic; Christians are expert strippers, and that's based on the fact that a HUGE majority of strippers in the US claim to believe in Christ.
Who walked away from it? The six well-paid sell-outs at AiG?
Those guys did it for money. For me, it would take evidence, really good evidence. Your turn.
As others said:
The theory of evolution might be the most publicly reviled theory in the history of science and its opponents had more than 150 years to falsify it. Actually, if any scientist would do so he would probably become the most famous biologist of all time. But instead nothing. All this time and hate and there is still no evidence that the theory of evolution is somehow wrong. That's why I don't dedicate my life to prove it (a fruitless effort since it is so glaringly obvious that it is happening) but instead study how it works exactly, which is much more fascinating.
“Evolutionists are expert tapdancers,”
Reeeeeeeeeally? Always thought that of creationist apologists. They only deal with one proof at a time, not the whole of the matter.
“as is obvious here in this forum. Think about all the people who dedicated there careers to proving evolution.”
Very few, actually. I mean, it’s established science. Now they’re working WITHIN the framework of evolution. There’s no need to prove it, just keep debunking creationist claims.
“ Are they so willing to walk away from it? What would it take?”
A better theory that addresses all existing observations AND incorporates a new observation that can’t be fit into the current theory.
So, as above, a rabbit fossil in the Cambrian.
An upper limit to a species’ genetic change.
Disprove deep time.
Thing is, it’ll need to be a scientific theory, not naysayers clutching their bible and their pearls.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.