It's funny to me that many of the same scientists who discount the Flood are believers in man-made global warming. While there's plenty of evidence for a worldwide Flood, there's no scientific evidence for man-made global warming. It is a pipedream. It is a hoax to enslave mankind to global authorities.
32 comments
"While there's plenty of evidence for a worldwide Flood, there's no scientific evidence for man-made global warming. "
You've got your facts backwards, Scooter.
Let's see: we have zero evidence for a global flood. We have plenty of evidence that says what CO2 and other greenhouse gases do, we know that we release a lot of them and we can see climate change going on.
Why, yes Joseph, I do think you're right. I'm pretty certain that exactly the same kind of scientists discount the Flood and "believe" in man-made global warming. Namely the kind of scientists who are actually scientists and look at the evidence.
Yeah. People really want huge chunks of ice to fall off of Antartica and killer heatwaves in Australia. And, of course, even if there really were no global warming, it certainly wouldn't benefit us at *all* to find an energy source that doesn't beholden us to regimes that hate us, or conserve our resources, or try to keep our air and water cleaner.
Wait. Scratch that. Reverse it.
flood<==>man-made global warming in that second sentence thar, pardner.
And the final two sentences obviously refer to the flood.
"It's funny to me that many of the same scientists who discount the Flood are believers in man-made global warming."
Why, exactly?
"While there's plenty of evidence for a worldwide Flood, there's no scientific evidence for man-made global warming."
I'm sorry, I believe you reversed the clauses of that sentence.
"It is a pipedream."
Can you actually define "pipedream"? Oh, shit, I forgot you were still working on the specificity of what's so funny about that first bit.
"It is a hoax to enslave mankind to global authorities."
Who the fuck are the "global authorities"? Oh, shit, the specificity, right.
No, a person can't be this stupid. He just got confused and mixed up. He meant to say that the "flood" is bullshit, and there's plenty of evidence for global warming. Wait, he didn't? Fuck, there's goes another few points for my faith in humanity.
"many of the same scientists who discount the Flood are believers in man-made global warming."
Many of the same scientists who discount the Flood also wear pants.
Clearly, pants are silly because they're worn by people who disagree with you.
GAWD! World Net Daily is the WORST fundie cesspool I've ever seen. In every story with a fossil, they're forgetting about the fucking RESEVOIR EFFECT and in every story with Obama they're calling him a "dictator", "socialist elitist" or some shit.
These people make me afraid to go on the internet.
1) how is that funny?
Well, my computer seems to have logged onto the bizzaro world's internet yet again.
Apparently, IE is far superior to FireFox here as well.
What fucking evidence for a flood? Marine fossils on top of mountains have an alternative explanation, you know. As for the Bible, the only thing that silly book proves is that some people will believe absolutely any shit.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
