also i would like to again point out how many times evolutionists have had to change thier doctrine. and that God remains unchanged =D if creationsism is a dead horse then why should evolution change so many times due to our resaerch.
17 comments
Yeah, science is a joke I mean, getting data and updating ideas and theories. What kind of loser does that - why don't they just state something improvable and believe that?
I mean, come on, it couldn't hurt technological advances that much, right?
Better yet, why don't creationists have one argument against evolution that isn't a misunderstanding (sometimes deliberately) of the theory? Evolutions made not even one change due to creationist babble.
People in the field are getting real sick of 40 year old crap arguments though. They are being wore down by that crap which is why it's still being used
Evolutionary theory has never been changed by creationist "research". Evolutionary theory has been changed by the research of people that accept the basic theory of evolution.
Evolutionary theory has remained basically the same in it's broad aspects the only changes have been in the specifics in response to new knowledge.
Science changes it's theories to fit with new information, which makes the theories more accurate. Religion buries it's head in the sand and ignores any new knowledge we acquire.
Modifying a theory (not a doctrine) in the light of newer information merely improves the accuracy of that theory. Sticking with a 2000 year old dogma and refusing to change,,,, well, guess how inaccurate it is ?
"also i would like to again point out how many times evolutionists have had to change thier doctrine. and that God remains unchanged =D if creationsism is a dead horse then why should evolution change so many times due to our resaerch."
So why the need for a King James Version of the Bible then, JesusHChristDerp...?
So, according to your logic, if scientists aren't allowed to revise, nay, refine their theories as new data - facts - are found, then you should start learning Greek and Aramaic.
...what's that, you say, JesusHChristDerp? You can't be arsed? Well then, just on that basis alone, it means you forfeit the right to question Evolution in perpetuity. Not taking into account Kitzmiller vs. Dover; Romans 13:1-5, and all that jazz.
The process of evolution hasn't changed that much through the millennia; either you survive long enough to have offspring, or you don't.
God remains unchanged? What about Jews, Christians, Muslims, Mormons, Jehova's Witnesses, Laestadians, Baptists, etc, etc, etc?
“also i would like to again point out how many times evolutionists have had to change thier doctrine.”
Yeah, REAL science finds one fact and sticks to it. That’s why dentists are still stuck to pliers for toothaches. Why doctors stick you like a pig and bleed you to balance your humours. Why no one uses that new-fangled anasthetic, neither.
"and that God remains unchanged”
This isn’t the flex you think it is. Change is improvement. Would you really like a car that had to hand-crank to start?
How about travel by prop plane where you sit in an uncovered pit?
ANd as someone older than the usenet that became the interwebs, science changes a LOT, and that’s coo.
"if creationsism is a dead horse then why should evolution change so many times due to our resaerch.”
YOUR research? SCIENTISTS are the ones advancing science. You guys didn’t discover Piltdown Man was a hoax, or correct the error of Nebraska Man.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.