"Don't be desived, Creationism IS a scientific theory."
Okay:
image
And remember: if [/Spartan Laconic Wit] - as you 'claim' - 'Cre(a)ti(o)nism' is a scientific 'theory', let's put it to the test, as per the above method; as in Scientific: Observation. Your own true 'Word of God' forces you to do so - and so what if your 'beliefs' & the basis of such, said 'Word of God' is destroyed in the process? Not our problem - via 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (KJV): Prove all things.
Prove. As in Evidence via Observation. Go ahead, Cre(a)ti(o)nists. No pressure. [/hyper-sarcasm]
True, some Creationists blindly follow because the Bible says."
Just like, say, Michael Behe. A Professor of Biochemistry, no less, and the Cre(a)ti(o)nists' last, best hope in keeping their 'agenda' alive in the eyes of the rest of the world.
"But others, look at the facts;"
Yes, such as John E. Jones III. A Conservative Christian just like you. Yep. he [i]certainly[/i] looked at the [i]facts[/i]. hyper-sarcasm]
"the evidance."
Now, I don't know what huge biomechanical mecha moving in a choreographed way has any relevance to your argument, pal. [/"Neon Genesis Evangelion"] X3
