>Where oh where did it all come from then?
It doesn't really matter. Ultimately you get to a point where you have to acknowledge that "something" has either always existed, or that it came from nothing. Saying that the Universe came from a creator doesn't magically solve the question. It just takes it back another step, but that step leaves you with the same problem.
Also, all things are made up of other pre-existing things. Even if there was a creator, he still needed the materials to create a universe with. If none existed, then he had to somehow obtain them from nothing. So saying that there was a creator, but absolutely nothing else, just complicates the issue, without getting us anywhere closer to an answer. An answer that again, ultimately doesn't matter.
>I'm still waiting for documentation to show dating systems are even worth wiping one's
Nuclear plants run constantly, and the Atomic bombings of Japan (which I'm guessing will make you hard just thinking about them) were possible based on the same understanding of nuclear physics which give us radiocarbon dating. If our understanding of those physics are completely wrong, then nuclear plants, and bombs would not work as they do. Since we get the results we expect from them consistently, it's reasonable to assume they work.
>Or perhaps a how minor adaptation produced anything other than the same species.
Wow! It's almost like you comprehend evolution more than you let on. You are correct, minor changes are just that, and do not produce a different species. Over the course of thousands of generations, and millions of years however you end up with a creature that is different enough from the original that it can be considered a different species.
