I've noticed that Evolutionists rely on hoaxes to prove their case.
I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution. If you know of some, I'd love to know about them.
For example Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics is a very convincing proof that Evolution could not have occured.
15 minutes ago
Source(s):
40+ years following a Jewish Carpenter & studying His Book!
61 comments
"For example Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics is a very convincing proof that Evolution could not have occured. "
Unless, of course, you actually know anything about the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics...
I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution.
Since we're on the subject, is there anything you'd like to say about the fucking epic number of hoaxes that have been perpetrated in an attempt to legitimise Christianity over the centuries?
"I've noticed that Evolutionists rely on hoaxes to prove their case."
Genetics is a hoax?
"I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution. If you know of some, I'd love to know about them."
The Dover Trail. Oh, wait, that was a farce...
"For example Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics is a very convincing proof that Evolution could not have occured."
A misunderstanding and misapplication of a physics principle probably isn't the best reason you could have.
"40+ years following a Jewish Carpenter & studying His Book!"
You have a copy of a book Jesus wrote? What the fuck are you sitting on something like that for? Publish it!
"For example Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamic...."
Sigh. Using big words to intimidate people may work in your church, but some people on the internet actually know what they mean. There is no "Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamic". There's Newton's second law of motion and the second law of thermodynamics. They are two different things.
As for the whole "second law of thermodynamics disproves evolution" meme, this is a hoax Christians use to "disprove Evolution". The sun supplies a trillion times more entropy flux than is needed for evolution to occur.
1) Earth is not a closed system, and thermodynamics has little to do with evolution, unless you're suggesting that we're made of photons.
2) That whole hoax involving a man's footprint under a dinosaurs footprint, for one.
Apparently, you are not aware of very much.
Your misuse of the 2nd law of thermodynamics is a good hoax to start with.
I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution. If you know of some, I'd love to know about them.
Well... God, for starters...
"I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution. If you know of some, I'd love to know about them."
There's this really big one - I think it's called... The Bible, or something...
Looking at that footprint hoax, it is clear to me that the "human one" was modeled on a shoe-wearing foot.
We all know that the Flintstones people went barefoot all the time.
What gives?
"I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution"
OH WHERE TO START.
"If you know of some, I'd love to know about them."
Well, there's the banana, the argument over carnivore teeth, all the arguments for YEC in general... Google them, dammit, don't be so lazy.
"40+ years following a Jewish Carpenter & studying His Book!"
I wonder if someday I'll get credit for writing a book that wasn't even in pre-production during my lifetime? I can only imagine...
I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution.
Absolutely right, there aren't any. On the other hand, there are plenty of hoaxes they've tried to use to disprove evolution and failed miserably at.
Hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove evolution?
Sure, there are many.
For one, how about the Dr. Behe argument
at the State Supreme Court hearing on the
case in Dover Pennsylvanina.
That 'Panda' book is another one.
Look them up. And there's more too.
For example Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics is a very convincing proof that Evolution could not have occured.
No it isn't. Creationists have given this argument up. And it was Clausius, not Newton. And "occurred" is spelled with two r's. Some pastor! A case of a shitten shepherd expecting clean sheep?
You are not aware of any hoaxes that christ stains have used to disprove evolution? REALLY? Are you saying that with a straight face? Piltdown man ring any bells? There's a good chance he was made by a christ stain. I have to admit, my absolute favourite thing that christ stains do is to take an honest mistake made by an archaeologist/paleontologist and blow it out of proportion a certain pig's tooth should come to mind.
Argh! I thought that maybe I had heard the last of the Newton's Second Law blah blah argument.
40+ years following a Jewish Carpenter & studying His Book! = Your only chance at life wasted. I feel sorry for you.
Hoaxes? I'm actually ignorant about any used to disprove Evolution. Ignorance, intimidation, lies, bumbling stupidity? Dover comes to mind. Something about Pandas and people. Expelled also rings a bell.
All those people who claimed to have found Noah's ark, fake dinosaur and human footprints together, crocoducks, lying about the contraction of the sun and dust on the moon, etc.
Oh, your comment is NOT supposed to be a hoax? Merely ignorance, right?
Newton didn't develop the laws of thermodynamics.
The second law applies ony to closed systems.
Jesus did not write the Bible.
Look at Chick's or Hovinds hoaxes (religious, not taxation) for blatant examples.
40+ wasted years.
By saying such things Pastor Arse, frankly, you're out of your league with what others can say to utterly destroy you & your beliefs verbally.
And Isaac Newton is turning in his grave by you connecting his Second Law of Thernmodynamics with something completely unrelated.
Proof that religious belief truly dumbs down people. Thank Goodness for the Renaissance, and the scientific discoveries that came from such, from which the rot started setting in (for religious dogma & beliefs at least), and was gradually replaced with the reason & enlightenment. You & your thinking are in the wrong time, Pasta Arse. You should be living in the Dark Ages.
"I am not aware..."
That much is certain.
"...of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution."
You mean "try to disprove Evolution." Anyway, what about Darwin's fabled "deathbead confession"? And the "ancient" Peruvian stones with dinosaurs on them?
Shroud of Turin
The discovery of Noah's Ark
The round rocks that were supposedly the wheels of Pharaohs chariots
Enough "wood from the real cross" to build a 70' cross
Every TV Evangelist in existence
Do I need to continue?
Edit:
Oh, sorry to disprove evolution
Well lets take a look at one of your own sources. Answers in Genesis. Here's a list of what they even consider bullshit arguments that people use.
http://www.kent-hovind.com/aig_debunk.htm
"I've noticed that Evolutionists rely on hoaxes to prove their case.
I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution"
Can anyone say "irony?" :P
I've noticed that Evolutionists rely on hoaxes to prove their case.
No, you haven't. You've just read that on a few creationist websites. Those hoaxes were all exposed by scientists.
I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution. If you know of some, I'd love to know about them.
The entirety of "Intelligent Design".
For example Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics is a very convincing proof that Evolution could not have occured.
For the millionth fucking time, THE SECOND LAW ONLY APPLIES TO CLOSED SYSTEMS AND THE EARTH ISN'T A CLOSED SYSTEM!
Oh, and Newton didn't work on thermodynamics.
"Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics"? Can it be possible that you have discovered the famous text "Scenicus Deletam Historium", detailing Newton's discovery of thermodynamics, Abraham Lincoln's "slavery" hoax, and the true identity of the fifth Beatle? THE WORLD MUST BE TOLD.
> I've noticed that Evolutionists rely on hoaxes to prove their case.
Hoaxes are thrown out upon discovery.
> I am not aware of any hoaxes that Christians have used to disprove Evolution.
Paluxy River tracks, used again and again and again.
> For example Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics is a very convincing proof that Evolution could not have occured.
"An isolated system's ability to do work decreases over time."
And how the fuck would evolution violate this?
The earth is not an isolated system by the way. The only isolated system in the universe is the universe itself.
> Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics
> Newton's
Get your scientists straight, man. It was Sadi Carnot that wrote the first formulation of the Second Law in 1824. (hint: Newton was long dead)
Then other scientists updated it, like Rudolph Clausius, Lord Kelvin, and Constantin Carathéodory.
Bananas, peanut butter, quickly-formed "fossils", global flood, any number of "miracles" and "irreducibly complex systems", and, best of all, hell.
Shall I go on?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.