Well, you could always look after all the unwanted babies in the world if you think abortion is so 'evil', Refail Sin.
The only one stopping you: is you.
Unless your answer is the only one possible, thank you for admitting that you don't care about - least of all for - them.
What are your thoughts about retroactive abortions - school shootings - in the US: since 1764?
Or do you think that loonies' rights to own guns - without background checks, which the NRA are opposed to, thus we know where they stand on this issue - takes greater priority over children's continued right to exist?
...or doesn't it matter, when they're already born?
Dunblane settled that issue.
What if a loony went loopy in a shopping mall, and he pointed at the belly of a pregnant woman a Desert Eagle loaded with .50 cal. Black Talon rounds?
Whose rights take priority?
Just ask the parents of kids who went to a Scottish school in 1996: and didn't come back alive, after a loony paedophile took four of his then legal toys to that school.
Nothing said by them about abortion. Least of all about the MPs in Parliament who, in a Free Vote since it's legalisation in 1967, have voted against any alteration of the existing legislation.
Therefore Abortion isn't murder. After all: what about all those American kids since 1764?
No school shootings in Britain's entire history up to 1996. No school shootings in Britain since 1996. That question, re. loonies, has been answered. And by the British public lobbying their MPs in Parliament. Who vote in the same who time & again vote against changes in abortion legislation.
Is retroactive abortion - and allowing it to exist by not lobbying for removing the 2nd Amendment - murder...?
