The sample size this man uses in an effort to prove his "point" consists of himself (and perhaps a few friends he met online while playing COD). The "data" he collects is based entirely on what he believes women want.
This idea he has developed by watching the few women with who he has any kind of relationship - I suspect his feelings developed simply by watching them and by reading crap on woman-hating boards.
Sorry, Unknown, but...
(a) Each woman doesn't work as doctor or lawyer merely because a medical examination board, or the area bar association, felt sorry for her and passed a potentially incompetent person into their ranks out of some sense of obligation or guilt.
I can provisionally accept the idea men and women exist in a close Bell Curve for the measure of intelligence, such that more women land in the middle of the curve than men whereas men are more likely to populate both the low intelligence group and the high intelligence group. I just do not see why it matters: Test blindly and pass people on their merits. Women will rise to the top when they aren't impeded by roadblocks placed to impede progress as punishment for the terrible sin of being female.
(b) Men like to be dominated too. There's a whole, massive sexual fetish community devoted to both men and women looking for people to dominate them. Nothing useful can be drawn from that concerning a woman's job performance.
(c) There are overlaps, some minor and some far more significant, between the physical strength of men and of women. I'm not sure at all why this matters: Researchers, for example, fight their battles in peer reviewed journals and not in the fucking Thunderdome.
Entirely setting aside the legitimate complaints average men have about such topic as child custody arrangements, when one looks at an MRA frustrated about why women won't give him sex, his problem stems most assuredly from his terrible attitude towards women. Contrary to what he may believe, women as a class are not stupid - and part of his frustration likely arises when only the dullest women will fall for 'the game.'
This is probably what baffles me most about loveshy and the MRAs, etc. There are people out there for them, including homemakers with highly advanced skills in such categories as sewing, who would be happy to encounter a would-be provider.
If a man such as Unknown wants a long-term partner - and I suspect he does - then it would be easier for him to do so if he actually respects women as well as having a more specific understanding of what he wants.
Rather than expressing anger that not all women are interested in the kind of relationship he wants, he should be flat out honest, sign onto a BDSM dating site, and ask for what he wants.
"Valuable subs" do exist, and they see their actions as part of a lifestyle. They come from everywhere, and may be highly educated or not. If this guy would like to make good with one, however, he'd do well to scrutinize his views on women and get rid of the ones that make him so undesirable as a mate. Easier said than done, sure, but how bad does he really want a relationship?
