I am in complete agreement with you that for the Court to overthrow the concept of God-given unalienable right, discernible to right reason, and to say they have authority in themselves, without regard to "the laws of nature and nature's God," to redefine the essence of marriage and to impose that redefinition on the people and on the states under threat of civil penalty for those who do not comply, is to overthrow the foundation of our form of government, to break our national compact, and in essence, to lay the foundation for secession from the union by the states, and civil resistance by the people against the demands of tyrants. If the Court unwisely takes this course of action, they leave the American people with no choice but to disregard their ruling, and they leave state government officials with the duty to protect the people in their respective states from a design to reduce the people under an absolute despotism. If the American people value liberty over their own lives-- and that is a big "if" these days-- they have no option but to resist tyrannical leaders who overthrow the rule of law, the rule of reason, and rely on the abusive exercise of "raw judicial power" to push their own political will on the people contrary to reason and common sense. This is a hill worth dying on.
15 comments
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.