“Because it [primate] incorrectly classifies man in the same category as a monkey.”
So, of course you object, but can you show any actual evidence that this is wrong?
“If I made a definition that put man and dump trucks in the same ancestorial line”
The taxonomy does NOT say these two species are from the same ancestor. The taxonomy says they have similar traits. Evolutionary theory tries to explain that observation by suggesting common ancestors.
"doesn't mean that it'd be right...”
No, but you’d just be doing it to make a point, not to advance the science.
“Just as humans are still Dump Trucks, right?”
Well, let’s see your definition of ‘dump truck,’ then?
“Mobile, have motors,”
Define motor,then?
“ two round things on thier face”
‘Round things.’ Are you suggesting that eyes (which take light in) are comparable to headlights (which emit light)? Are you stupid or just homeschooled?
“and one input mechanism for air, both have gas and are full of garbage.”
Dump trucks that lay gravel aren’t full of garbage.
THAT was a short peer review….
“ Yep, humans are by definition, dump trucks.”
You’ve listed traits. Are you capable of listing THE definition of a dump truck?
