As a German Aspie, I would like to suggest for you to follow the example of your beloved Führer Adolf Hitler, in that you commit suicide right now, despicable eugenicist.
As a naturalist atheistic rationalist, I agree that organised Atheism does seem to suffer from self-righteousness and even bigotry. I mean, there are countless posts where history is just what is convenient for my worldview ("the Middle Ages were a thousand year GRIMDARK age! Because of Christianity! Everyone believed the world was flat!"), as is theology ("Jesus is just stolen from (myth that has little resemblance to Jesus)!", Revelation is treated as a LSD diary instead of the allegorical work it very obviously is); the definition of religions also shifts for convenience (atheism is just not believing in any god... unless "we atheists" are all naturalists who apparently also have specific political beliefs; meanwhile, all Christians are creationist anarchocapitalist anti-enviromental gunhoarding fundamentalist children of an Anne Diehl/David J. Stewart pairing); there are no evil (or) rightwing atheists (e.g. Ayn Rand, HP Lovecraft, a certain Croatian, many neoreactionaries; Hitler's real religious views are far from unambiguous, and Communists have indeed generally tried to replace the etablished religion with their own ideology); really immature mockery (specifically looking at you, Anon-"lenghty incoherent meme in-joke rant England is perfect sky pony otaku hahaha"-Moose, but really, all that "sky fairy", "BuyBull", "Chri-stain", or whatever cheap insult is popular right now) and much more that reads pretty much exactly like many of the more boring quotes (honestly, I think there are way too many quotes that are just generic "Evolution is wrong and evil", "Women should stay in the kitchen", "I hate gays/atheists/communists/muslims/jews/blacks/Obama", "X is a false flag" et cetera instead of actually "darndest things"), yet they crop up in pretty much every comment thread.
Opposing something, even if that something is bad, does not necessarily mean you are good. It might just be that it is a rival (as was the case with the conflict between Fascism and Communism), nor (most probably more relevant here) that you have not lost connection to reality, pragmatism and proportion to become a fanatic who is just as bad as - or even worse than - your enemy. Even if there has been no atheistic terrorism up to now, at some point, especially as the number of atheists increases, someone will eventually radicalise himself to the point where he burns down churches and shoots christians because "Religion is keeping us back, so we must exterminate all Christians before they can burn us at the stake!" Meanwhile, the self-righteous tone (particularly when it comes to homosexuality and racial issues) risks alienating those who do not hold conscious racistic/homophobic beliefs but still carry prejudices unconsciously, possibly driving them into the propaganda of the bigots who claim that they do in reality not want equality, but Black/Jewish/Homosexual Supremacy.
Finally, I think the category of "Fundie" should be narrowed down, probably to religious and comparable philosophical/worldview idiocy and general science denialism. Then there would be the "Sexists STDT" (including crazy feminists, and possibly other kinds of sexuality related idiocy) that has been demanded for years, and "Extremists STDT" for all the gun nuts, libertarians, communists, anarchists, eugenicists, neoreactionaries and other madmen and madwomen of the social sciences. Maybe also something like "Haters STDT", for extreme hate against specific persons (Ken Ham on Bill Nye, DJS on Taylor Swift, too many to list on Obama).
From the new layout preview, the apparent tag system might be very helpful.