The Bible is real, because of all the truth it contains.....
It's inspired by God. I know man couldn't have written it by himself!
40 comments
No, "man" (singular) couldn't have written it by himself. It would probably be more coherent if it had been written by "man" (singular). "Man" (singular) wrote the Book of Mormon and the Qur'an, and "Woman" (singular) wrote Science and Health and A Course In Miracles.
Stephen King could write a Bible and a half in his sleep in one night and it would still be more consistent and better reading than any of the above, and he writes doorstops.
Dollars to dead snails you've never read the whole Bible. Enough of this claim that the Bible is great literature or so wonderful that it must be that word of God. The Bible is poorly organized, badly written, self-contradictory CRAP.
I do not deny that the Bible is real, but then, the steaming pile that just came out of my dog is real, too. Neither is wonderful, great or inspired by a god.
Yeah, he couldn't do it by himself. He'd need the help of some serious psychedelic drugs, a handful of irritated monkeys to edit it, and a co-author with a proclivity for sexism and sadism.
well why the hell couldn't a man have written it? after all, they did write it.
and seriously, the bible is NOT a greater work of fiction than shakespeare's plays, or dicken's novels, or my beloved gabriel garcia marquez... now if one of them wrote a bible, that'd be cool.
No, of course not. People write all manner of fiction, make movies, stage plays and radio shows that have a profound impact on everyone's imagination... but the bible? No! Nobody could have written THAT.
[/sarcasm]
Let's see:
The Bible is real it contains all the truth(quod est veritas?, Jesus answered that better than you, believe me)
It's inspired by God but a man can't have written it?, why?, because we don't have a pen and a piece of paper?, or don't you know the meaning of inspiration and authorship?
Rebutt1: If that's truth, I'd hate to see what you consider lie/false.
Rebutt2: The manual for my Buick LeSabre has a lot of "truth" in it too, does that mean we can start worshiping it?
Rebutt3: Man couldn't have written it by himself? Why is that? Because man hasn't written tons of other books throughout history? The mere fact that you see it before you should tell you that man not only COULD but DID.
Yes, no man wrote the bible by himself.
It was written, edited (poorly), translated, mistranslated, and generally fucked up by hundreds of men over hundreds of years.
You spin me right round, Kiwi, right round, like your fundy logic, right round round round.
dworkin wrote:
"I think a M.Moorcock version would be fun."
I like the part where Noah's Ark is floating on the flood waters, and then BAM, Straasha reaches up and grabs the Ark and crushes it. MAN, that rocked!
If that's what god does, I don't want any of that shit. Oh, wait, you're saying it's not the name for a new drug?
If the bible's existence was dependent on the amount of truth to it, then people wouldn't even be able to think about it. Or does it exist in the same manner that the villain in Sword of Shannara did? Sadly I've misplaced my sword of truth to test it out.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.