[Sceintists created a computer program that uses the process of evolution to make complex 'living' virtual structures out of the smallest life.]
They designed a computer program to make it! They contradicted themselves!
26 comments
The computer program is the virtual universe, with relevant natural laws, local environment and some simple self-replicating life. Unless in subscribing to the theory of evolution one has to deny the existence of any of these things, there is no contradiction. You'd have to be ass to propose there would be.
They designed a computer program to mimic some of the known mechanisms of evolution, and apparently it works. If anything, that's in favor of evolution. Similar to when scientists plugged variables like gravity and matter into a computer - TAH DAH! They saw the same web-like galaxy formations that we know exist.
Oh dear, no one on the site argues against this... though there are a few "amens."
[]...uses the process of evolution to make complex 'living' virtual structures out of the smallest life...
So when a working computer model based on evolutionary principles actually works, i.e. complex living virtual structures out of the smallest life(forms), it's contradiction? He better check what are the units for time-scale the model is operating on, cause I can bet my skinny ass, its got to be many many million years before an ant evolves into something of a species that resembles a wasp.
And if this guy is in fact correct (highly unlikely), the scientists will have to improvise on the code, cause if a fundie can spot this error, a non-theist is sure to spot it in an instant. There isn't a contradiction, its just poor coding. All they gotta do is change the time scale, and you got an impeccable evolution simulator - sans contradictions.
I think he means it's a contradiction because they had to design a program to set up all the conditions of the universe rather than just let it all come about by itself.
This, of course, fails to note that the conditions inside a computer =/= the conditions inside the universe, therefore for one to mimic the other, yes, some design has to be involved.
So, instead of running a computer model, how does he want scientists to do any sort of experimentation on the subject? Observe a second universe forming and watching sample planets in it for 15 billion years?
~David D.G.
To those who don't know what this is about:
Fundies claim throwing random numbers into a computer won't make a program, so how could evolution be true?
Someone tried this, and discovered that not only did throwing random numbers into a computer make a program, those programs would also evolve into an amazing set of "creatures" that occupy different niches: big programs that crush competeing programs, small agile programs that escape the big vrushers, parasite programs that feed off other programs execution cycles, parasite resistant programs etc.
This program evolution is so powerful that the experimenter at first thought other scientists were writing the programs as a joke and putting them in his computer when he wasn't looking.
And godslittlefertiliser? This is equivalent theistic evolution, which you fundies denounce as no better than regular evolution.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.