[You may think I'm supposed to have children, but you're wrong. I simply have the capability to do so if I wish.]
A hundred years ago you would have been hung for being so defiant.
56 comments
A hundred years ago you too, because a hundred years ago there were more wars, more hunger, more crime..........
100 years ago was the around the time of the woman's movement and last I checked none of them were hung, (at least that I am aware of) although many were imprisoned. Their actions lead to the free will that you dislike so much today. So, you're both sexist and ignorant of basic history. Congratulations.
Dang, should have read the thread first, it's even more hilariously sad than I though.
Later on in the thread:
Hey, I didn't say you have to use it. As a matter of fact, it is probably better if you don't reproduce. I would hate to have another retarded kid to make fun of.
noself : Michael Richards is the actor/comedian that played Cosmo Kramer on Seinfeld. He recently went on a racist tirade during one of his shows directed at a couple of black guys that were heckling him.
Women have never, in general terms, been compelled to have children. Sure there may have been instances where it happened, but not on a grand scale.
No, a hundred years ago it was 1907. We were reasonably civilized by then, and nobody was hanged for deciding not to reproduce. At least, not legally, if it happened at all. And even if that had been the case, it sure as hell isn't the case today. Pining for an imaginary past is all very well, but you have to face up to the way things are.
A hundred years ago you would have been hung for being so defiant.
No, you would not, Debra. Women were not hanged for being "defiant" or not having children. Divorced, maybe, but that's not quite the same.
From wikipedia
I can never decide whether to laugh or cry at the sheer arrogance and total lack of empathy in these sociopathic death cultists.
They would have been first in line with the pitchforks and flaming torches in an earlier age, denouncing anyone the didn't like as witches. Or sitting, happily knitting, by the guillotine as those they envied got the chop.
While I try to find the good in most people, this sort shit me so much that I can't even be bothered trying. I've met too many of these in real life.
They do nothing of value in society and most are so far beyond mean-spirited they have passed over into evil. They are a total waste of oxygen.
Debra Henry, you're a cunt, and an ignorant one at that. No one was being HANGED in this country in 1907 for not having children. You are a vile, loathsome excuse for a human being and a woman. If you have children, I hope they grow up to despise you and disown you as soon as they turn 18.
Let's say that every woman was forced to have kids and is fertile. I would have several schizoid (pathologically introverted) kids who would in turn not want to reproduce. So now, instead of having one individual not reproducing, you have eight. Is that really better?
"A hundred years ago you would have been hung for being so defiant."
Not a century ago, nor even two centuries ago. You'll have to go back to the 1500s and Henry VIII before you find "failure to reproduce" treated as a crime, and even then he had to found a new church for the whole country because the Catholics wouldn't give him permission to divorce.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
