"If the line is flatter the farther you go back this only shows that you would not still be sinning now in that exponential progression because this curve approximating eternity of the past, is deemed as eternity, thus having had an eternity to be without sin, yet you still sin. Since this is not possible, you were created by the uncreated who is God of the Bible because none can compare to Him. You lose all the way to hell and in hell. How sad for you."
Actually, what that curve shows is that hypothetical past eternity was full of sin, according to your mis-logic. Or, at some point, Conscience Zero is reached. Presumably that point (let us define it as A) is the point at which humans were created (or came into being as sentients). Now, by having A defineable, you imply that you know this point already. So, the question remains, how did you come up with the equation for that graph? Even if it involves links, please post the equation itself in addition to any sources.
Also, while she is a godless lesbian, a friend of mine has said that your graph is badly drawn. Also, my godless lesbian friend thinks that your graph shows a really big gap between God and the time of Mankind's creation. She says those are "Six Really Fucking Long Days". Could you please add some numbers to it, so that we can ascertain the validity of your illustration?
Also, since the increase in conscience applies only toward the saved, which, according to you, I am not...how does it prove anything? After all, being unsaved, I could have had as long as I like to sin, and the graph still wouldn't apply to me.
In addition, wouldn't it be simpler to draw the graph as a downward-progressing exponential decline, with Sin measured on the Y-axis, and Time on the X?
"It's hard for the scientific evidence to deny the exponential progression in conscience. The last century women were allowed to vote whence before along that flat curve they could not."
Actually, many ancient societies were matriarchal. Voting did not exist back then, and the monarch or shaman wielded all of the power. Since fertility deities were commonly worshipped in those times, the power resided in the hands of a woman.
"The curve is virtually straight up for child sacrifices, since they are not prevalent anymore as they were before along that flat line."
Ah, but child sacrifices were never that common in the first place. Children, despite the popular myth, had little value as sacrifices. An enemy warrior captured in battle, or possibly a virgin woman, or even the captain of the winning Aztec basketball team, was much better.
"On and on you find the same thing. Even in the past 50 years, the crime rate in US follows an exponential drop."
Because of social reform, the decline of racism brought on by societal acceptance of minorities, and new laws. Religion had nothing to do with it, as your message has remained constant for two thousand years...the Bible has existed for quite some time, and caused some of the darkest periods in history.
"Even multiple spouses is frowned upon today whence before it was prominent in societies."
Multiple spouses, a sin? Remind me again how many wives Solomon and Moses had, my friend. While it is against the law, and the mores of society, polygamy is not technically a sin. In fact, all you've proven is that today's society rightly values the laws of man above the laws of God.
"See the exponential curve. It is undeniable based on the evidence. But what you do you have? Nothing, but self's independency and hostility to your creator. How terrible for you! For nothing could be worse."
I actually do not see the exponential curve, as I have demonstrated above. Furthermore, I still want to see sources. Numbers. Scientific backing. This isn't the first time I've asked, either, or can't you find the evidence? I have logic, reason, and if I go to hell Satan might give me leet demon powerz. Bat wings and horns are undeniably sexy, and black looks good with everything.
