The Constitution says:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
In that, the liberal Jewish controlled court system has convoluted that to mean all issues related to Jesus Christ and His Father must be removed from anything the government touches, even remotely.
I can’t imagine that our American Forefathers envisioned the Jew-imported, non Christian, false-god worshiping, invading mongrel hordes filling our country.
Anti-Christ demon worship was never intended to be protected or accepted. The American Forefathers intended only variations on Christianity.
34 comments
Very secular variations on Christianity, if at all.
Alternatively, you could just respect all establishments of religion because if they wanted something else THEY COULD DAMN WELL SAY THAT. Thank you for your time. Go fuck a fiery cactus.
The Constitution says:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Something here...
The American Forefathers intended only variations on Christianity.
... doesn't seem to fit.
I can't understand what you're saying with George Washington's cock shoved so far in your mouth.
The forefathers weren't gods; they were very flawed people, just like any age.
And you don't understand the meaning of the 1st Amendment, obviously.
@nigelD:
Well, we would still have the MRAs, the radfems, the Randians, the incels“,
I’ll stop before I lose the rest of my faith in humanity.
In that, the liberal Jewish controlled court system has convoluted that to mean all issues related to Jesus Christ and His Father must be removed from anything the government touches, even remotely.
Um, the same also applies to Judaism and any other religion.
The American Forefathers intended only variations on Christianity.
... which is why they turned to a Jew to finance the Revolution.
@Kuno
... PETA, radical environmentalism, woo, pseudoscience, rape apologetics, child abuse apologetics, and anybody talking about Commie-Nazis.
"the liberal Jewish controlled court system"
I bring to your attention the most recent addition to the SCOTUS; Sonia Sotomayor ; the first Latino Supreme Court Justice:
'Religion: Roman Catholicism '
Yeah. Puerto Rico is just chock-full of Synagogues ; her ancestors were all Jewish , weren't they?! [/hyper-sarcasm]
It was the early RCC who codified what you know as the Bible today, so if anything, you should be praising Thomas Jefferson, and what he did to the later Bible that itself had changed from that initial codification by the RCC.
Were the Founding Fathers Jewish? No? Well then. Your argument is invalid .
"I can’t imagine that our American Forefathers envisioned the Jew-imported, non Christian, false-god worshiping, invading mongrel hordes filling our country."
that's because you have no imagination.
Thus far the invading mongrel hordes have treated me well. I mean, sure, we have to say "Hale, Horde" when we encounter one. But that's no big deal.
So according to Matt, the American Forefathers intended only variations on Christianity, but they were kinda busy and forgot to add those extra words to "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", and none of the states that ratified it noticed.
So apparently "No law respeceting an establishment of religion" means "The law must implicitly endorse my religion."
Opposite Day already, where DOES the time go?
First you said...
The Constitution says:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Then you said.
The American Forefathers intended only variations on Christianity.
Does it hurt when your brain goes into reverse all of a sudden?
You know, I don't think it's Jews, or Muslims, or Atheists, or anybody else here that's trying to make an incredibly straightforward statement out to mean a bunch of shit nobody ever said that contradicts the statement it's being shoehorned into.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
I've read this several times but can't seem to find the "except for variations of christianity" bit. Am I missing something?
Man, have you ever se en a Jew in tour life?. Otherwise, how do you think they could have influenced un an ammendment ratified 150 years before they has their own state?. If they had so much power they could have prevented the holocausto, for example
"Anti-Christ demon worship was never intended to be protected or accepted. The American Forefathers intended only variations on Christianity."
But surely anti- Christian worship is a variation on Christianity; Catholic Christian, Baptist Christian, Episcopalian Christian, Anti Christian... see?
"Anti-Christ demon worship was never intended to be protected or accepted. The American Forefathers intended only variations on Christianity."
And just how could you possibly know what they intended? Were you there? Can you communicate with the dead? Can you read minds?
Citation seriously fucking needed.
Hey everyone! Lets all sing the fundies' favorite song, the Jew Song! Jew Jew Jew Jew Jew Jew Jew Jew, Jew Jew Jew ,Jew Jew Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew. Repeat ad nauseum.
So where's the part about the founding fathers intending it to be only for Christianity?
And even though it's 100% certain that they didn't mean freedom of religion for Christians only... SO WHAT IF THEY DID? That wouldn't change anything. It would just mean we're more enlightened than they were.
They were human beings. The only accurate assumption here is that they had no way of telling what the future would be like. Things change. That's why we have something called amendments.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
