Prove that there have been people who have died (since Jesus death and resurrection) who have not heard of him. So far you're making claims but you have no proof. You have no evidence that proves they were never given the option of choosing Jesus. If God sent an angel to tell Mary she was pregnant, He could just as easily tell some guy on a remote island about Jesus.
22 comments
...Yeah. However, God also told people to spread the good word amongst all the peoples of the world so that he didn't have to/because he was busy/had an appointment with his angelic commission on hair length and its effect on his cherubim.
While it's entirely possible that there is not a group of humans left on the planet that has NOT heard of Jesus, I don't have very high hopes for that.
And in closing, allow me to point out that while we may not have proof that there are people that have not been "given the option of choosing Jesus" (what, is he a soda or something?), you offer no proof that they _have_.
I'm pretty sure North and South American natives, along with Australian aboriginals and the entire Polynesian population of the Pacific islands, knew nothing of Jesus until missionaries came upon their shores.
Mind you many weren't given much of a "choice" even then. It was either believe or be killed or enslaved.
"Prove that there have been people who have died (since Jesus death and resurrection) who have not heard of him."
Try looking up the Tasaday people who only became known to people outside their homeland sometime in the 1950's and known world wide in the 1970's. I'm sure there have been other peoples discovered since.
I would think that in nearly 2000 years a couple of them may have died without hearing of Jesus.
"You have no evidence that proves they were never given the option of choosing Jesus. If God sent an angel to tell Mary she was pregnant, He could just as easily tell some guy on a remote island about Jesus."
And now you fall back on supernatural hocus-pocus to save your shaky argument. How surprising.
This seems like trying to twist the doctrine that all who didn't hear of the Gospel in life will go to hell. instead of making some obfuscated and clumsy rationale, why not have a new doctrine that would fit into the idea of a loving God: that those who didn't hear the Gospel aren't going to hell just because of that?
"This seems like trying to twist the doctrine that all who didn't hear of the Gospel in life will go to hell. instead of making some obfuscated and clumsy rationale, why not have a new doctrine that would fit into the idea of a loving God: that those who didn't hear the Gospel aren't going to hell just because of that?"
But where's the fun in that? Er-- I mean -- what are you doing, trying to twist God's words?? OFF WITH HIS HEAD!
10-20 generations of Aztecs, Incas, Mayans, Inuit and various other American Natives would disagree with you.
maddog quote: "I have heard of this Jesus character, and personally, I think I would have been better off without this knowledge."
To All: This is not my post. I never wrote it. I'm not saying he's unfunny, just an imposter.
maddog: Could you please find an original name, or else Yahweh might have to force us to register to keep everyone honest?
Just more than 90% of the humankind. As far as I´m concerned, America, Asia and many other continents, Europe included, were not proselytised but after many years after Jesus´s death and resurrection. That makes a fairly big sum of people, doesn´t it?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.