Well, how about my theory as to why: feminism has rotted atheist/darwinist brains, so therefore, they believe that God must be a she-god or eunuch god, because to a brain rotted by feminism, she-gods and eunuch gods are "normal" and "not funny at all,"... but a Male God who is a Father, King, and who has a Penis is "not normal" and "the most hilarious thing ever!"
By the way, I wonder if when atheists pray to their eunuch god, they ever ask him: "how did you get cut?"
Even if God's Penis is "funny," it's nowhere near as funny as is the atheists' penis-less eunuch god!
29 comments
"I wonder if when atheists pray"
Navaros: "So, are you Chinese or Japanese?"
New Asian Neighbor: "Neither, we are Laotian."
Navaros: "The ocean? What ocean?"
New Asian Neighbor: "From *Laos*, stupid! It's a landlocked country in South East Asia! Between Vietnam and Thailand! Population approximately 4.7 million!"
Navaros (face gradually getting a WTF?’ look): "Umm... Uuh... So are you Chinese or Japanese?"
Well I guess that I'll have to go add atheist shrines to the she-god and the eunuch god, next to my shrines to Darwin, The Big Bang, evolution, abortion, and Satan. Damn we atheists worship a lot of gods
Anyone who is capable of even rudimentary thought (including probably the most professional priests throughout history) knows that any entity that could control the entire universe would have to be so abstract and complex that it could be equated with the anatomy of mere material animals, at least in a literal sense, would be utterly absurd.
By the way, does anyone know Navaros's gender?
This guy has a serious hard on for the Almighty Wang...
Why would God need a Penis?[/Kirk]
The whole thing makes so very little sense. How is it a requirement of the Creator that said being have a dick? This implies that the concept of masculinity (or at least some concept of maleness) predates creation, since the implication is that the Doomhammer of Creation is an inherent part of said Creator.
Is Navvie here horny for God? Do they wish to feel the holy schlong for themselves? Is that where all this is going?
image
Someone obviously does not know what an atheist is. And they seem strangely obsessed with "god's" genitals...
Query, why would one omniscient, all powerful god have junk or a gender, exactly? What purpose would either serve?
FIRST: Atheists don't believe in any sort of deity or Higher Power!
SECOND: Why would a mysterious abstract spirit-being have literal physical genitalia?
THIRD: What's wrong with God's Holy And Righteous Vulva? If The Supreme has sexy-bits, it would make sense if it were both due to The Divine Powers being multi-gendered. After all - Yin & Yang, Shakti & Shiva, Anima & Animus, JEHOVAH & SHEKHINA, YAHWEH & ASHERAH, LOGOS & SOPHIA!
FOURTH: Please tell us, oh Navarros, where the Feminine Principle and it's beauty, grace and awesomeness, came from!
FIFTH: Not having a penis does not automatically mean "eunuch". It could also mean "female"....which is equal to male. Also; Being a eunuch does not affect one's character or ability to accomplish stuff. All one loses is both the ability to reproduce and a big sex drive.
I have mentioned here before that we have a common swear in Hungarian, "Isten fasza", (pron. "ish-ten fuss-ah") which literally means "God's dick". To be fair, though, we sometimes say "Isten picsája" (ish-ten pit-chow-ya), which means "God's cunt", although Hungarian Christians usually agree that God is male. It may be that attributing female genitalia to God instead of male "junk" sounds more dramatic. We use these in a similar way to "Fuck!" or "Goddammit!"
This is dumb even by your standards.
Atheists are thus called because they do not believe in any gods at all. They don't do acts of worship because they do not believe any gods exist to accept their devotion.
I'll explain this to you like you're four:
To them, gods don't have genders because things that don't exist don't have genders.
"Atheism" is a religion like bald is a hair-colour.
On a personal note, neither you nor Jerry nor the rest of the peanut gallery are helping your fellow theists at all . (Theism and atheism have it alike in this: We're judged by our most demented members - except that atheists are distinct minority when compared to theists, which leaves them open to all sorts of underhanded bullshit most theists never have to deal with.)
"Well, how about my theory...."
Sorry, bub, that's not a theory. It doesn't even make it into hypothesis territory.
@ #1967622 LightsaberBlues: I am so going to use those around the office!
Regards & all,
Thomas L. Nielsen
Another topic that comes up on Atheist Experience frequently. Their belief that everyone must worship something.
Another false premise pushed on them by the church:
It probably stems from their claim everyone believes (stupid from get go) but refuses to live by the book (like they CLAIM they do) so they create this straw-man.
On Atheist Experience it get stupid real fast as they try to defend this.
They don't even realize this cheapens their idea of worship more than anything.
One phoner had heard Jack Dee respected the work and writings of Abe Lincoln. "Then you worship him" he insisted. When Jack told him he doesn't pray to him or observe Holy Days around him the guy simply insisted he does or it's the same thing if he doesn't anyway. The propaganda has to start young for such belief to be so deepset as to ignore all evidence or the level of commitment otherwise.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
