Now, what's important to note, more important than the fact that they were wrong, is just how wrong they were. You see, they were wrong by a factor of a few million.”
Why is that important?
I mean,if you can disprove all the evidence that leads to the current scientific model of Earth’s history,that’d be impressive. But crowing about just HOW different the two narratives are… Why is that an important note?
“They thought [different types of dinosaurs] lived millions of years apart, they turned out to be living at the same time.”
Oh. Wow, you can find stegosaurus bones that show the dentition of a t-rex chewed on them? Or lions? You can SHOW that these species were all living together?
"Wow.”
Sounds like you’re overimpressed by some unsupported claim, really. How did you prove this to be wrong?
“Now, if they're wrong about the man-from-monkey thing, hoho-boy! That's a bad mistake to make.”
Except no one says ‘man from monkey’ you illiterate goon.
“I mean, if God made us in his image, and you think you came from a monkey, that is a baaad mistake to make, I mean that's baaad.”
Yes, you keep repeating yourself. But If i can stand honestly in front of your god and say ‘this is the evidence i found for the stance I took,’ and YOU are next to me saying, ‘i filtered the evidence to match a book someone said that you wrote…’ Well, maybe I’m not the baaaad one?
