“scientist actually calculated from facts that there is a 69.7564^256th power percent possibility that God exists.”
Exactly how does naturalistic science determine the possibility of the supernatural?
You’re pulling shit out of your ass, or repeating gossip.
"these were atheist scientists too.”
Doesn’t matter, it’s just not fucking possible to do this.
"they were trying to prove that God does not exist.”
SCIENCE is neutral on the existence of the supernatral.
So no, they were not.
“so if they come up with the opposite result for trying to disprove God, those that try to prove it will get better results.”
No. This never happened. The way to disprove God would be to challenge the believers to produce evidence FOR god. Then start a timer.
“the whole thing about faith is this, "Seeing is not believing, believing is seeing."”
No, seeing is an observation, so you have evidence.
“this means that we would not believe just because we can see, we believe because we cannot see.”
Then faith is not distinguishable from fantasy.
"you cannot see light”
Yes, you can.
“wind”
But we can hear it, feel it, measure it, power boats with it. It’s not a FAITH in wind.
“gravity,”
Part of my job is measuring it to five decimal places.
“or a magnetic field. yet you can see the effects of them”
We can measure magnetic waves directly.
We have direct observable and repeatable measurements of all these examples of things that are not ‘faith’ knowledge.
"this is the same with God”
God shows up on thermal imagery? On a wind vane?
"you do not need to see God to know that he is there, you merely need to see the effects of his presence.”
But how do you determine that it’s GOD’S presence, not Allah’s, or Odin’s, or Ishtar’s? Or a bit of underdone potato? Gravy vice graveyard?
Or just a really strong BELIEF in god, totally isolated from any god existing?
