(This is Amos's "evidence" that homosexuals destroy societies )
the evidence is EMPIRICAL ..... they do NOTHING to BUILD a society ....... and here is the evidence ......
Take a number of homosexuals, both sexes, put the males on one island, put the females on another island ........give them anything they want or desire ..... deprive them of nothing ..... but they cannot leave and they cannot have the opposite sex ...... come back in 60 years ...... nothing will be left ........ society DIES ..........
YOU DO NOT EVEN NEED TO ACTUALLY DO IT ....... this is a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ...... and you KNOW .... EMPIRICALLY ........ that is it true .............. and its RESULTS are ZIP, ZERO, NADA ........ DEATH ........
18 comments
put the males on one island, put the females on another island [...] but they cannot leave and they cannot have the opposite sex ...... come back in 60 years ...... nothing will be left ........ society DIES ..........
*facepalm*
I'd say they would still fare better than heterosexuals under these conditions...
PS:
EMPIRICAL
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
I know EMPIRICALLY that the same would be true if you put heterosexual males on one island and heterosexual females on one island, you blithering idiot.
Besides, something will be left in both cases. People, regardless of whether they can reproduce or not, will create things. Most humans like to live in a comfortable, pleasant, and beautiful environment. If they don't have to bother with child-rearing, this trait would be even more active.
Oh, and I think that they will find a way to reproduce, in both cases. Yes, homosexuals can reproduce, just not with people of the same gender.
Amos' argument against homosexuality is homosexuals are evil because they can't procreate with partners of the preferred gender. And that's seriously his whole definition of "building"?
They could have left art, literature, science...but no progeny - and, in a world with a population rushing toward eight billion, that makes them somehow inferior?
So let me get this straight: "Making babies" is the only thing that constitutes a society? Literally nothing else that's not dependend on sex? Like laws, art, literature, science, culture...
And they say non-christians are sex-obsessed sinners...
Sir Elton John, David Furnish: and their two sons.
What have you done to add to the future of humanity, Amess ?
A fundie colony, however, would not even last that long due to a combination of idiocy, incompetence and an internecine inquisition.
Take a number of heterosexuals, both sexes, put the males on one island, put the females on another island ........give them anything they want or desire ..... deprive them of nothing ..... but they cannot leave and they cannot have the opposite sex ...... come back in 60 years ...... nothing will be left ........ society DIES ..........
So, then, straight people destroy societies?
Oh, my favourite brick wall is at it again! Amos, you better watch out, Trumpoo`s still looking for something to place on the Mexican border, he just might use you!
Homosexuals are a minority, Lesbians & Thebans would have no interest in banging each other, everyone else will continue reproducing, there's over 7.5 Billion people on the planet, Earth's resources are taxed, your thought experiment is a major FAIL.
I win. You lose!
Homosexuality is Nature's defense against overpopulation.
Also....In-Vitro Fertilization is a thing and many folks "Play both teams".
Finally; You'll get the same result if both islands were populated by Heteros. I would work better if the Thebans and Lesbians were on one island....you giant idiot.
come back in 60 years ...... nothing will be left
Hmm, St. Paul wrote a good christian should be chaste unless he/she really can't do without. So, put a group of good christians on an island, "come back in 60 years ...... nothing will be left".
Hey listen, it's right there in your own Bible.
....and he said this again, almost word for word, in the comment section of another Christian News Network story, 4 hours ago. Even brought up the same crap about "empirical evidence," displaying his failure to understand what that actually means.
Oh, and it was a story about that guy in California who's running for Congress and is a pedophile and white supremacist...but not homosexual. He thinks that if "HOMOMIRAGE" (as he calls it) wasn't made legal, no one would think they could get away with that kind of thing.
Unless I have personally met Amos Moses many years ago, sadly he's not the only one who has ever made that argument. I tried pointing out that very obvious flaw, but the person in question was basically no, both islands would need to have a mix of both men and women to be a hetero equivalent.
Oh hello again, Amos, you still sound like talking to a brick wall.
I heard they left Crusoe and Man Friday together on an island for years, no women. What do you think happened next? Now, don't get too excited...
Course there'd be nobody left after 60 years, but it made a good yarn, better than some of the ones that you believe.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.