“atheistic faith herein”
Um, i don’t have ‘faith’ in atheism. No more than i have ‘faith’ in electrolysis. But from what i’ve seen, both are reasonable explanations for what the world does.
“never told that there are credible scientists who harbor significant skepticism towards Darwinism”
Are any of them credible biologists?
Trick question, no one uses ‘darwinism’ except creationists.
“and even doubt that Darwinism creates a reasonable foundation for atheism?”
No credible science is a basis for atheism. Science cannot have a position on the supernatural This is like saying Cookie Monster has an opinion on vampires.
“Can the so-called intellectuals not see the deadly poisonous viper in the grass, the lawn of knowledge?”
Apparently not. But is this viper something you have to believe in before you see it?
"Science is an ever changing field of expertise.”
Yep. Improving over time.
“Scripture is NEVER CHANGING, yet much of what was once considered absurd in scripture, has since been proven scientifically factual.”
What? The slavery? Women as property? Tyre will never be occupied again? The places where Satyrs and unicorns dance?
The moon as a light source?
The solid sky, the rainwater from trapdoors, chests of hailstones by the trapdoors?
No, sorry, the book is frozen in bronze-age superstition and desperate attempts to pretty it up with lipstick.
