"Atheists claim to "think for themselves" but the bottom line is, they do not; most of them simply jump on the bandwagon of hate (as evidenced by the evil spewed forth in atheist websites), and take the word of others in order to form their own opinions...."
...so why are you homophobic, Jer: If - unlike we Atheists - you somehow have your own 'opinions' completely separate from what your 'Christian Bible' says, Jer?
http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=116762&Page=1#1914411
@Pharisee Jerry
"The true Christian has no likes or dislikes as far what the Bible teaches"
Therefore you'll tear out of your Bible any & all pages that conflict with your differing thinking, will you not? Just ask Thomas Jefferson. That's what he did with his.
Editing the Christian Bible for his personal purposes, and to conform to his differing way of thinking. Just as you do. Just as every other fundie Christain does: it's called Cherrypicking: making the Bible conform to their own subjective 'opinions'.
Because that's what you - who thinks for himself, and would tell the basis of his own 'beliefs' to go fuck itself - would never do, amirite Jer...?! [/hyper-sarcasm]
I guess that's why you don't have any mirrors in your house.
...cue Mister Spak, and a pic of the main reflecting element in the Hubble Space Telescope.
One more thing: if the 'Elect' are predestined for salvation before anything was created by your 'Lord', then it's always been that way: way before you were created to say 'it doesn't have to be this way'.
Apart from certain high-end makers - usually in Switzerland, Germany, Italy & a few other countries: they being Rolex, Omega, Patek Philippe, Eterna, Baume et Mercier, Jaeger LeCoultre, Panerai, Junghans, Sinn etc - most watches have quartz movements. Sekonda. Accurist. Timex. Casio. Citizen. Seiko. So the Seiko adverts in the late 1970s were correct: 'Someday, all watches will be made this way.'
Unless your 'Lord' has somehow delegated his 'Who's Saved and who isn't' powers to you alone, how do you know that all we Atheists aren't among the 'Elect'? Can you prove otherwise? Can you discern if Jack Chick is one of the 'Elect', Jer...?! You must be able to: you relie on his tracts so much: even though you yourself have admitted that Chick is a liberal source.
If his tracts serve such a great purpose for you, which require you to mention & link such to us, therefore Chick must be like you - one of the 'Elect' - surely...?! But then, how can he be one of the 'Elect', if Chick is, by your own admission, a liberal and therefore Satanic? Ergo, by virtue of your mentioning & linking such, you yourself can never be one of the Elect.
'Contextualise' your way out of that little doctrinal/logical/argumental corner you've painted yourself into, Jer. If you can.
