There is a theory of Creationism. It can be found in Genesis. It's just as logical, if not more so, than the assumption that inorganic molecules managed to somehow live... replicate... and evolve into the most complex machines we've ever seen. (The human body.)
Have fun with all the "proof" you think evolution has. It's being debunked by science, not religion, year after year.
23 comments
"There is a theory of Creationism."
No, there isn't.
"It can be found in Genesis."
Genesis is a Bronze Age best guess that is wrong in every statement it makes.
"It's just as logical, if not more so, than the assumption that inorganic molecules managed to somehow live... replicate... and evolve into the most complex machines we've ever seen. (The human body.)"
Nothing in Genesis is logical.
"Have fun with all the "proof" you think evolution has."
I don't "think" it has evidence, I know it does as I've seen it. You can too if you'd open a book, take a class or visit a museum.
"It's being debunked by science, not religion, year after year."
Sure it has.
"It's being debunked by science, not religion, year after year."
No, it has never been debunked.
"There is a theory of Creationism."
Wrong.
"It can be found in Genesis."
Genesis is a work of fiction, most of which was plagiarized from previous belief systems. You'll have to find a better source for this "theory."
"It's just as logical, if not more so, than the assumption that inorganic molecules managed to somehow live... replicate... and evolve into the most complex machines we've ever seen..."
What you're describing definitely isn't evolution. And did you say "somehow?" Yeah, that'll win you the Nobel Prize.
"Have fun with all the "proof" you think evolution has. It's being debunked by science, not religion, year after year."
It's creationism that's been utterly debunked. Your argument reminds me of 9-11 Truthers, screaming "we've got the evidence and we're winning!!!!" when they're like 3.6% of the population.
In science, pure logic is irrelevant if it is not backed up by evidence. Creationism does not have evidence to support even its feeblest claims that are actually falsifiable. And evolution is just getting more supported, year by year, whereas creationists just slip further into completely refuted arguments.
Magic is not tenable in any analytical framework. These assumed acts of god are impossible in the real universe. End of that story.
The Cosmic Singularity is by definition a super natural event. It is anybody's guess at this point "who" or "what" caused it [or indeed precisely what happened], so we can agree to name this mystery "God" as a simple convenience. If omniscient, this primal cause would do its thing instantly... and never need to adjust anything. It doesn't require anybody to pay any spiritual rent either.
As corollary, any subsequent supernatural entity [and I have my pet speculations on that] that requires perpetual human suffering for "sin", gummed up the works by introducing the potential for sin in the first place.
The most complex, and horribly flawed organic machines we've ever seen, created by a supposedly all-powerful and all-knowing being. Yeah, A MAGIC MAN IN THE SKY DID IT AND THEN A MAGIC FRUIT FUCKED UP OUR SHIT is more logical than the foundation of modern biology.
It's being debunked by science, not religion, year after year.
Citations, other than Fundie Junk Science, please.
Nope, your biblical account of creationism is no theory, at least not in a scientific sense. It lacks any supporting evidence (nope, an entry in a religious book, written 3000 years ago doesn´t count as evidence).
Calling the biblical account on creationism a theory would have the same credibility as if we would take the stories about Santa Claus, postulate that he is real and then publish an account on everything concerning Santa Claus (how he lives in his house in north pole, how he spends his only worknight, ev4erything about his reindeers, why he is real, and so on) under the name of Santa Claus theory
;)
Evolution has been debunked by science, not religion, year after year? That explains why creationism has now replaced evolution as the accepted explaination for the development of live on Earth within the biolgical community.
Have fun with all the "proof" you think creation has. It's being debunked by science, not religion, year after year.
Problem solved, dickface!
“There is a theory of Creationism.”
There’s a story. A real name-dropper.
NOthing says HOW God did anything. He just does it.
“It's just as logical, if not more so,”
One creationist assertion is that complicated things require a creator. LOGIC would then suggest that God therefore needs a creator. This is not something the faithful will accept, so various means are used to except God from the basic logic. That’s not logical.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.