“Your lack of knowledge of the "scientific community" is laughably obvious in your question.”
I suspect your haughty response says the same about you. But moreso.
“Evolutionists can't even agree on WHICH evolutionary process to subscribe.”
To.
WHich process to subscribe TO. Learn you summa dat English stuff.
And every single scientific theory out there has a conflict somewhere inside it, where there’s insufficient evidence to be fully convincing one way or another.
“Darwinian Evolution says that we evolved over long periods and barely perceptible incremental change.
Gouldian Evolution says we evolved in short, rapid bursts after long dormant periods known as "punctuated equilibrium".”
SO… Either a whole bunch of microevolution collects to cause macroevolution… Or a whole bunch of microevolution collects to cause macroevolution…but faster.
Yeah, that’s not what ‘diametric opposition’ means.
“In case you can't tell - these two "facts"”
Theories. Those are theories explaingint the facts, numbnuts.
“are diametrically opposed to each other!!!”
Except they are not. For Diametric Opposition, we’d need a theory where the macroevolution came FIRST, and the microevolution tied up loose ends after, or something weirder.
“You guys can't even get your stories straight!!!”
Oh Noes! Scientists largely agree that evolution is happening, but disagree on a minor detail of timing…. Yeah, that’s worth three exclamation points!!!
“ Until you do, why don't you keep your mis-application of your pseudo-science to yourselves!”
Okay. And you keep your superstition completely away from anything like a school, okay?
