Sex is short for sexual intercourse. The definition of intercourse is "Dealings or communications between persons or groups." So, sexual intercourse is intercourse between the sexes. As such, there's no such thing as homosexual sex.
49 comments
"So, if homosexual sex doesn't exist, how can it be a sin?"
Good point, guess that Christians have nothing to fear from homosexuals infrenging on their religion.
Use of the dictionary in this context would only be useful if he had looked up the phrase "sexual intercourse". As with many phrases in the English language, it connotes more things than its component parts. Jayson, you are an idiot.
Jayson states:
1) Sex = sexual intercourse
2) Intercourse = Dealings or communications between persons or groups
3) Sexual intercourse = intercourse between the sexes
Therefore:
Sex = Dealings or communications between the sexes
I guess that would include, talking, handshakes, buying a newspaper...
Thanks for making a great argument in logic, shitface.
Hm. It includes "groups" in the definition, so orgies must be ok. But orgies must necessarily involve two or more people of the same sex. But homosexual sex can't exist, so I'm just hopelessly confused.
Jayson states:
Sex = sexual intercourse AND
Intercourse = Dealings or communications between persons or groups
THEREFORE
Sexual intercourse = intercourse between the sexes (meaning male to female intercourse)
I continue to be truly amazed at the convoluted thinking that these poor deluded Xians can come up with. I started to sau convoluted logic, but this is about as far from logic as one can get.
Sex is short for sexual intercourse.
That's a false premise right there.
Jayson- Variant of Jason Mythological Greek hero captain of the Argo, Jason did not exist. Therefore, using Jayson's unique logic, Jayson does not exist.
What an idiot. Jayson spent the time looking up "intercourse" but neglected to look up "sexual," which means "of, relating to, or associated with sex or the sexes," or "having or involving tha act of sex," so a better definition of "sexual intercourse" is "dealings between persons involving the act of sex." Duh.
That is the most twisted, um, logic, I have ever read. I use use the word 'logic' lightly of course.
Wow, failed by your own definition. Two persons can be a man and woman or two of either, or three of each, by that definition it does not matter. You have just failed spectacularly.
There's got to be a word for people who nitpick over etymologies and historical definitions in order to avoid using a word to say what it means now. There was a guy on Wikipedia who used to do that (interestingly, he was a Greek Orthodox monk) -- he would consistently harp on the "classical" definitions of words, and would put up a fight over anything that disagreed with it. It was embarrassingly similar to a typical interdenominational doctrinal dispute, except in this case the guy was being demonstrably a jerk.
"The definition of intercourse is "Dealings or communications between persons or groups." So, sexual intercourse is intercourse between the sexes"
You quoted definiton of intercourse says nothing about two opposing genders.
Wait a moment, I must have missed a step there. How did you go from "persons or groups" to "between the sexes"? Last time I checked two women are two persons and three women are a group.
Is group-sex OK, then?
If there is no such thing as homosexual sex, then there is also no such thing as communication between two women or two men. Funny, I must have imagined the phone-calls from other women I got this morning...
"As such, there's no such thing as homosexual sex."
"The definition of intercourse is "Dealings or communications between persons or groups."
Wouldn't any form of talking be known as INTERCOURSE by your standards? so two people of the same gender can NEVER EVER TALK?
Great! So there's nothing for you to worry about!
Man, I've got to pull that out with my fundie grandma sometime...
AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Oh, man... that was good! That was good, OP. I give you 50 points for originality. Now, go eat a cookie or something.
Anon-e-moose
"intercourse. The definition of intercourse is"
image
image
image
(and no, that's not me in that photo, before you ask!)
image
And right up my end (chortle, guffaw, fnar-fnar!) here in Yorkshire:
image
Which is the sound one gets by blowing the Pink Oboe...! X3
“Sex is short for sexual intercourse…. So, sexual intercourse is intercourse between the sexes.”
The sexes? You JUST SAID sex is short for sexual intercourse, so you just defined sexual intercourse as intercourse between the sexual intercourses.
Words do have meaning, but bullshit is chaotic.
Anyway, there are many definitions of ‘sex’ and uses, especially in certain specialities. One use in biology is for ‘sex’ to indicate the exchange of genetic material. So single celled creatures can have ‘sex.’ But a man with a condom, or a vasectomy, does not have that form of sex with his wife.
"The definition of intercourse is "Dealings or communications between persons or groups."
Yes. To include a pair of men having naked ‘dealings’ between their persons.
“As such, there's no such thing as homosexual sex.”
I think you’d have a better shot defining-away gay Marriage. Unless you can find a definition of ‘dealings’ that expressly excluded sexual intercourse.
Or maybe a definition of groups that similarly excludes a pair or more of gay men?
You have not erased homosexual sex through wordplay. Just wordstupid.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.