W's decision to get Saddam was supported by most of your liberal heroes until the public got tired of it. Now they're all backpeddling. Saddam needed to go. W was the only one with enough b@lls to do the job. Your friends the evil muslim terrorists from Iran and Syria are making sure the war stays going.
28 comments
actually it was backed by politicians because A) they were lied to from day 1 about evidence, proof, etc about the whole thing (strange how the ever-so-slightly-right-of-right-of-right-of-right of center media 'omits' to mention it on primetime outside of a 2 minute 'oh and it might've been a lie' admission over in a little corner between weather and sports...)
If Iran and Syria is backing the "evil muslim terrorists" [which ones? I always forget who we're fighting, but then so does BushCo] to make sure the war stays going, then what is Bush doing by sending in more troops? Making sure the war stays going!
fucking shit.
Yeah, I actually agree with part of what you said. All those liberals should be embarrassed by being taken in by a scam artist using fake intelligence info to star a war for profit for his buddies. W has balls , where were they when he hid out from Vietnam? Yeah, lots of balls to send someone else to die when you dodged when your chance came! And he should have read his Dad's book on "why not to get rid of Saddam"! Really, is that why Bin Laden claimed credit for Bush's re-election? Is that why he called him the greatest thing for Arab anti-American unity and promoting terrorism among Arabs since the birth of Israel? Oh, I'm sorry you watch FOX, ie. GOPFOXNEWS. You have no knowledge of anything to do with the world except what Rove wants you to hear via his propaganda machine. My bad!
Actually, since the war in Iraq has: Bush who's doing the most to "support" the terrorists. W is the best thing that ever happened to bin Laden and Al Qaeda.
sandy, you do not need our help in making you 'look' weak. You *are* weak...intellectually; you have obviously been gulled by the reactionary paranoia-mongers.
Saddam was supported by most of the republican governments including Bush senior, until he invaded Kuwait. And it was Clinton who stopped all this insanity. And maybe Bin Laden is not killing you thanks to the fact that Syria and Iran are keeping their integrists tied and well tied, AS SADDAM DID, DEAR, not like the idiot Gulf monarchs, who are unable to control them(which nationality were 19 of the hijakers?, ding, ding, ding, not Iranian nor Syrian, they were from SAUDI ARABIA)
"Why did Saddam need to go? And if he did need to go, why doesn't the Saudi royal family need to go, too?"
If this typifies an American Idol fan, that explains why folks like Clay Aiken, Carrie Underwood, Kellie Pickler, Bo Bice et al. get votes.
Yeah, I guess we're showin' them all right.
Sure, nothing, and I say nothing encourages religion-based terrorism more than a secular dictator, yup yup. Don't get me wrong, Saddam wasn't the ideal state leader, but he wasn't the worst of them either.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
