What does creation science teach?
The Bible tells us:
Genesis 7
10 And after the seven days the floodwaters came on the earth. . . .
23 Every living thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; men and animals and the creatures that move along the ground and the birds of the air were wiped from the earth. Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark.
Q. "If there really was a world-wide flood, what would the evidence be?
A. Billions of dead things,buried in rock layers, laid down by water,
all over the earth."
From: Billions of Dead Things - Buddy Davis
Q. What does scientific evidence show?
A. "billions of dead plants and animals buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the world."
See: The World's a Graveyard (Conclusions)
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v3/n2/world-graveyard
The Bible, creationism, and scientific evidence are in agreement.
Let's teach the truth.
31 comments
The Bible, creationism, and scientific evidence are in agreement.
No, they're not. The layers you are trying to say proves 'creation' are millions of years old, not 6000. FAIL!
Let's teach the truth
You wouldn't know the truth if it sat on your face.
More suitable evidence would be genetic bottle-necks in every species, which I haven't heard of except in humans, who were down to 2-3 thousand or so. Not 10, not 2.
It's frightening, this fundies tendency to imagine that their hallucinate and twisted perception of world is real.
And they call that Thruth.
Q. "If there really was a world-wide flood, what would the evidence be?
A. Billions of dead things, buried randomly in a uniform layer of mud laid down by water, all over the earth."
Q. What does scientific evidence show?
A. "billions of dead plants and animals buried in rock layers neatly sorted by species."
What does evolution teach?
Billions of dead things buried in layers all over the world.
What do we see?
Billions of dead things buried in layers all over the world.
Let's teach the truth. Your mythology isn't truth.
well, in the most simple of ways, yes. If you go into the most elementary of details, however, you see that those rocks are far too old to coincide with your time period (except the top most layers), organisms are sorted into strata such that they could not have been laid down all at once, and then there's of course the fact that several pesky cultures refused to believe they were being killed by a global flood and continued recording history anyway.
Q. If billions of animals in mid-meal rained down from the moon, what evidence would there be?
A. Billions of dead plants and animals buried in rock layers which were created by the force of impact of the descent.
Seriously, the rock layers are inconsistent with what could be laid down by a flood, and the animals' placement is inconsistent with how they would be placed if they were all integrated into the fossil record by a single event.
Don't you find it odd that the only place anyone ever finds a mention of the world-wide flood is in holy books and other myth-containing materials? You never seem to find it talked about or recorded in contemporary histories.
Let's teach the truth.
Don't push us. As a collective entity non-theists love nothing more than taking apart people people like you and arguments like these.
The Bible, creationism, and scientific evidence are in agreement.
No, they're not. The Bible says the universe was created 6,000 years ago. We have a supernova (SN1987a) that was measured by direct triangulation at 169,000 light years away.
What the evidence does not show is hydrological sorting of dead lifeforms. That is just one thing where the facts disagree with your fairy-tale. There are many more
What it shows is that certain forms of life only existed before/after others. In fact, something like 90% of life that has ever existed came before our "modern" time.
And FTW, read about tectonics and the effect that has on the surface of our planet.
not, "laid down by water"
of everything that ever lived 90% of what's been found doesn't exist today and most of what exists today didn't millions of years ago.
evolution wins. Let's look at the evidence without the story
What does the Pastafarian science teach?
The guide to pastafarianism tells us:
Q: If there really was a connection between the number of pirates on earth and the earth temperature what would the evidence be?
A: We would see the temprature curve of earth either rising or falling in accordance with the declining number of pirates.
Q: What does the temperature curve show?
A: The graph shows that the decline in pirates on the world lead to rising earth temperatures.
The church of the flying spaghetti monster and science are in agreement
Q If there really was a world-wide flood, from which 2 (or 7) of every kind of animal were rescued, what would the evidence be?
A. Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers laid down by water, who were identical to creatures alive today.
Q. What does the scientific evidence show?
A. Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers laid down by water, who look like velociraptors and trilobites, none of which are alive today.
What does the belief that you murder hookers teach?
That there will be dead hookers
What does the evidence show ?
Dead hookers.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
