I wonder what it would take - with all of the information out
there - videos and pictures and descriptions by abortionists, testimony, etc - for a pro-abort to convert to pro-life at this point? Basic science and logic did it for me, long before the internet became public and while I was still an atheist. But, with all of the visuals, with the womb with a view (ultrasound),
a person has to be really beyond a moral monster to remain on the side of abortion "rights." Either that, or he must be unbelievably selfish to place his sex without consequences ahead of the life of an innocent human being with intrinsic moral value.

The argument against abortion is a moral and scientific one:

1. Human beings have intrinsic moral value and fundamental rights. (basic and positive morality).

2. Assigning rights arbitrarily amongst human beings has proven catastrophic. (history of the world).

3. What is located in the human womb, post conception, is a human being. (settled science).

4. Therefore, abortion kills a human being with intrinsic moral value and fundamental rights - one who is guilty of no crime.

The only difference between a human being in the womb and one outside of it is size, level of development, environment, and degree of dependency. And each one of those factors, if used to argue for abortion, could be also used as a reason for killing a child OUTSIDE of the womb. In abortion clinics all across America today, nearly 4000 human beings with intrinsic moral value – guilty of no crime but their mere existence – are being led to their deaths, and gruesome ones at that. Can’t we all come together and bring our laws up to date with 21st century science and basic human compassion by passing a Life at Conception Act and ending forever this brutal crime against humanity – and the resulting and reprehensible trafficking in baby parts that derives its profit from it?