"Yes, I believe that the modern scientific community is heavily biased against creation and the only reason they refuse to debate creationists is because they're afraid of what they might learn - what they already know - that their theory is bankrupt."
Then why is the theory not only widely supported in the scientific community but so successfully employed in fields such as the pharmaceutical industry or agriculture?
For such a "bankrupt" theory it sure seems to have a lot going for it.
"Every time I've seen a debate between an evolutionist and a creationist, the evolutionist always loses."
I'm sure it appears that way to some. The main reason is that it takes a hell of a lot longer to explain something in a scientifically accurate manner than it does for the creationist to say, "Godidit!" and take his bow and get his round of applause.
Anyone not familiar with the topic, not well educated in the topic or simply not intellectually curious enough is going to be bored out of their skull as soon as the scientist begins using too many words that aren't monosyllable so they'll tune out. Sadly, for many people "Goddidit!" is an acceptable answer simply because they don't want to have to think about the question at hand nor listen to a detailed explanation for an answer.
"At the beginning of the debate, the evolutionist has almost 100% support of the audience, but by the end of the debate, the creationist has a standing ovation, and there are about 2 people clapping for the evolutionist."
See above.
"THAT'S why evolutionists are afraid to debate us."
They wont debate you, aside from the reasons above, because it's utterly pointless to do so. You keep repeating the same bullshit over and over anyway, no matter how often you're corrected, and the sheeple in the audience simply aren't interested in actual facts anyway.
