What more evidence do you need than the BIBLE?
21 comments
Speaking personally, if you are expecting me to live my life by its archaic rules, to accept it as an accurate account of human history and to forget what I know about science in favor of creationism, then you had better have a lot of evidence.
Several historical sources that corroborates the Bible.
Any evidence. You've provided none. All the religious scholars over all this time can prove none of it. The cities and rulers mentioned don't count as many other cultures predating Abrahamic religions can also do this, and many of those cultures were never mentioned by the Bible.
Homer's ahead of all Biblical claims of lost cities as Troy has been (after long being considered a legend) located. It wouldn't surprise me a Soddom and Gammora or Jericho is found, and found to be earthquake victims
Evidence for what?
That countless trees have been murdered to print a zillion copies of a book which is even more useless than a telephone directory from 1921? I have more than evidence for that - Rapture Ready, for instance.
Other than that, the bible is evidence only for the almost depressing extent to which people can be deluded by meaningless crap.
"What more evidence do you need than the BIBLE?"
That a bunch of Bronze Age goatfuckers had ideas above their stations? If that's all you want, fine.
But for the rest of us who live on Planet Reality, enquiring minds need to know, and all that jazz. It's the reason why you have the computers you have to spew your fundie bullshit, you know.
Sane response: "Any for all matters that aren't specifically about the Bible"
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
