[Supersport is trying to claim that Richard Dawkins is as unreliable as oral tradition of 'the ancients', the whole back and forth is full of this non-sense.]
...we have no way of confirming what Richard Dawkins has "observed." There are no pictures, videos, procedures, data sets....or anything else. Prove me wrong.
27 comments
Wait...what? Yes, we have ways of confirming what Richard Dawkins has observed...the books and papers that he has written! The fact that, in regards to scientific experiments, they are replicable and in regards to facts, they are externally verifiable. In regards to ideas, they are logically consistent with the first two sets of information. What more do you want?
The Bible is actually a cookbook written to teach bored housewives how to make erotic cakes and the last few hundred pages are paid advertisements for escort agencies. Prove me wrong. No I'm not going to read any of the information I'm told to because I don't believe it will change my mind. I'm not going to read anything, I'm just going to sit here with my fingers in my ears and my eyes closed singing folk songs to myself. See, you can't prove me wrong can you ??? Can you ???
Illuminatalie,
Thall shall not bear false witness.
You know better than that.
If god doesn't want us to lie, we should value truth.
If we tell truth(s), it is not for, or on behalf of, satan.
BTW, satan may be the great deciever, but word has it he's a straight dealer
We have the fossils.
We win.
Dawkins is a respected scientest, like Sagan before him.
They hate knowledge.
This guys asks for proof of reality. Shows you how he thinks.
True.
I submit to you that there are no videos, pictures, procedures, or data sets for the Bible either, and if someone had made it all up, we would not know the difference.
I have no idea what you just said.
However as this is Supersport, I will simply say "WRONG!" anyway. Because Supersport has never said anything correct that I've ever seen.
It's supersport. Kent Hovind's accolyte. It's pointless providing any evidence to this guy. He simply disregards it and repeats his demands for evidence.
Kinda like:
Scientist: That pea is green
Supersport: Where's your evidence?
Scientist: I can see it's green
Supersport: Where's your evidence?
Scientist: YOU can see it's green
Supersport: Where's your evidence?
Scientist: I measured the reflected light spectrum and it shows it's green light. Here's the printout.
Supersport: Where's your evidence?
Scientist: Comparative studies with other universally accepted norms show that the reflected light is in the same area of the spectrum as other objects that are accepted as green. Here is the report and 100 books all in agreement.
Supersport: Where's your evidence?
. . . ?
Is supersport high or something?
There are photes. Try Google Images. You can find videos online too. And other evidence? Well, the entirety of his written work, would count as evidence, I should think!
I can't even form coherent sentences anymore. The stupid here just burns. I can feel parts of my brain melting away.
@moose
"They should do like 4chan and start banning "prove me wrong" faggotry. One dumbass down, way too many to go."
Richard Dawkins invented memes. That's how awesome he is. Compared to him, Stuporsport is Epic Fail Guy. Put Stuporsport up against Milhouse, even the latter is a meme.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.