"Have any of you ever been on an Easter egg hunt when you were small? I have and I truly believed in the Easter bunny by virtue of all the eggs that I discovered."
I don't personally recall ever truly believing in the Easter Bunny. Santa I was a bit speculative of, but I gave him the benefit of the doubt since I saw no reason why a jolly fat man wouldn't possibly exist who enjoyed giving things away. A large rabbit, on the other hand, that had an odd compulsion to hide painted eggs seemed a bit too far fetched.
"Could it be that all that science has put together is like the Easter eggs that have been put there for us to discover and we are attributing that to evolution and not God the same way children attribute Easter eggs to the Easter bunny and not the parents who really put them there."
Except that the evidence for evolution points only to natural forces. Look, this is how it is: either the bizarre solutions, bad "design" and sometimes non-sensible things we see were done through a natural process, which you would expect to give you such things, or your god is the single worst engineer to have ever existed. There are a few other options, but still none you'd want to choose.
Take your pick.
"In order for us to prove our faithfulness to God we have to be given the opportunity to choose and for that to happen there has to be something else to choose from say... evolutionary theory."
Where does it say this in your Wholly Babble?
"There is plenty of evidence to support the existence of God and yes, although there can be arguments for the evolutionist to cling to, there are just too many assumptions made to avoid the evolutionist theory being degraded at every level."
There is no evidence your god, or the god of anyone else, exists. If you believe there is, show it.
I'm not quite sure what assumptions you believe are being made about evolution. I have no doubt that some assumptions have to be made but they're probably more like educated guesses than anything. It may not be known exactly how or why X works, but there's a good idea of what's happening which lets you explain Y without actually knowing everything about X.
"I believe that we are discovering new things every day and I also believe that these things have a logical place in creation and that it is our own ignorance that prevents us from seeing the beginning from the end."
Show evidence that any such "creation" exists. All I see is a universe that appears, no matter how hard or in depth you look, to have been formed through natural forces. Most of which are quite basic and well understood; gravity for example.
"Using what we have been given to discover about our world to discredit the existence of a creator is like using Easter eggs to discredit the roll of our parents in the whole show."
Eh?
Granted, I just got up so maybe my brain isn't working full force yet but that sounds like one hell of a lousy analogy.
