[I as a pro choicer rely on SCIENCE and CDC statistics, which show the safety of abortion as a medical procedure.]
Yes, but you are still killing an unborn baby. It is quite safe for me to fire a colt .45 at a person deadly for them. My point is that science has not justified abortion just made it safer. Science has also not justified killing grown people anymore, but its sure a lot safer and easier today.
Science has not proven that a baby isn't a baby eather. The recent science has disproved damn near every lie the prochoice movement has made. What you are a victim of is propagando of a prochoice movement. You can trace back every quote that a prochoicer argues to an abortion industry leader. Why do they do it? Maybe for a blood sacrifice to satan or perhaps just for the hundreds of millions of dollars made each year by servicing abortions.
 
        
        25 comments 
        
            
                
                And judging your spelling, are you a victim of homeschooling?. Well, just the baby isn´t a baby, IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE TO ME.
 
        
            
        
            
                
                "Yes, but you are still killing an unborn baby. It is quite safe for me to fire a colt .45 at a person deadly for them."It's not a baby until it is born.  It's a blastocyst, embryo or fetus, but it is not a baby. 
"My point is that science has not justified abortion just made it safer."
Science is a method for determining what is true and what is not true about our universe.  It is not a philosophy.  It does not deal with justifying anything. 
"Science has also not justified killing grown people anymore, but its sure a lot safer and easier today."
Science doesn't deal with ethics.  People formulate ethics.  Science is a method for discovery. 
"Science has not proven that a baby isn't a baby eather."
No, but a quick trip to a dictionary wil clear that up for you. 
"The recent science has disproved damn near every lie the prochoice movement has made."
And lies should be disproven, that's one of the tenets of science.
Ridiculous science imposters like Ham, Terry and Hovind make all sorts of claims about what the pro-choice movement says, but they are not real scientists and most of what they claim is rot. 
"What you are a victim of is propagando of a prochoice movement."
Propagando? 
"You can trace back every quote that a prochoicer argues to an abortion industry leader."
There is not abortion industry.  And, when the facts are known, they should be on the lips of everyone regardless of who spoke them first. 
"Why do they do it? Maybe for a blood sacrifice to satan or perhaps just for the hundreds of millions of dollars made each year by servicing abortions."
Yeah, we drink the blood and eat the embryos on our morning toast.  Then we leave our mansions for a quick helecopter ride to our beachfront abortion clinics.
Shut up you ignorant moron. 
 
        
            
        
            
                
                How many cells make a baby, again?  A number would be useful.  Thanks.
 
        
            
                
                 WritingIsMyReligion:   Blood sacrifices to Satan have almost vanished, but I, for one, still indulge. But I prefer virgins to anything found in a clinic. Trouble is, it's a helluva long time between sacrifices. 
 
        
            
        
            
                
                Or, you know, because the woman was raped, or too young to handle having a child, or would risk severe medical complications by giving birth, or was too drunk to use proper protection, or wouldn't be able to afford a baby or raise it correctly, or simply doesn't want to have a child .
 
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
                
                It's always whinge, whinge, whinge about the reasons for abortion; really, there only needs to be one reason: my body, my choice. If it so happens that the little clump of cells is proven to be a real, live baby with feelings? That's still no reason not to abort if it will in anyway interfere with my life. 
 
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
                
                Science has not proven that a baby isn't a baby eather. image 
and this
image 
are the same thing?
This is what it means to be pro-choice. It dosn't mean that you are for killing babies like you think, it means that you think that women should be given the choice of wiether or not they should have an abortion. I have talked to someone who had one, and she said it was the most painful thing, both physically and emotionally, she ever had to do and said she would never do it again. Me personally, I don't like the idea of abortions, but I don't think I have the right to tell anyone what to do with their bodies.
 
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
                
                Science has not proven that a baby isn't a baby eather. The recent science has disproved damn near every lie the prochoice movement has made. What you are a victim of is propagando of a prochoice movement.if it's the pro-choice movement that's lying with propaganda why do all the pro-life websites have so much false, manipulative, junk on them?  when clueless, assume satanism!  
 
        
            
        
        
     
    
    
    
        Confused? 
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in  or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.