America's law enforcement system has become over-reactive due to the feminist agenda. The police are over-reactive. The courts are over-reactive. Judges are often harsh, cruel and unjust. People often defecate on themselves in the courtroom, because of cruel judges who have no respect for others. Prison sentences are extremely long and unfair. Numerous private prison owners have lobbied lawmakers to greatly lengthen prison sentences, which means much more money for “the system.”
When people no longer care about the Holy Bible, all sense of fairness and doing the right thing are gone! Judges don't fear God, they fear the federal government. Lawyers fear the judges. The entire legal system operates on fear of the government, not fear of God. This is why murderous abortion is legal. This is why wickedly banning the Holy Bible from America's classrooms is legal. This is why same-sex perversion is legal. This is why wickedly quitting one's marriage is legal.
Many men are rethinking marriage these days, deciding that it is not worth the benefit-to-risk ratio. They see their fathers, older brothers, and friends suffering unjustly at the hands of a corrupt court system that caters to feminists. The court system goes after men! Perhaps you say, “Good, men ought to support their children and wife.” Ok, but now what about a man's right to expect his wife to cook, clean and care for the children? What about a man's right to sex on demand? The courts don't enforce a man's right to have a responsible, submissive and obedient wife. If a man works and the wife is at home with the children, she ought to cook for her husband. He has a right to expect a homecooked meal and a clean house. But that's not how the courts see it. The courts view what I just said as a form of domestic abuse!
18 comments
America's law enforcement system has become over-reactive due to the feminist agenda.
No, dummy! It's over-reactive due to the exact opposite. In fact; The Fuzz could use a good dose of estrogen and feminine "ways". All that "Shoot First" mentality is very stereotypically masculine. All that aggression and machismo.
That's not the say that the Feminine can't be aggressive and fiery by nature (just ask Kalika-Ma and Sehkmet)....but femininity is not about machismo and female aggressiveness is not about "compensating for something" or "just because". The Feminine Ways emphasize balance, nurturing, openiness, less ego, etc.
Many men are rethinking marriage these days, deciding that it is not worth the benefit-to-risk ratio. They see their fathers, older brothers, and friends suffering unjustly at the hands of a corrupt court system that caters to feminists. The court system goes after men! Perhaps you say, “Good, men ought to support their children and wife.” Ok, but now what about a man's right to expect his wife to cook, clean and care for the children? What about a man's right to sex on demand? The courts don't enforce a man's right to have a responsible, submissive and obedient wife. If a man works and the wife is at home with the children, she ought to cook for her husband. He has a right to expect a homecooked meal and a clean house. But that's not how the courts see it. The courts view what I just said as a form of domestic abuse!
OH, DIE IN A FIRE! WOMEN ARE EQUAL TO MEN! DEITY IS ANDROGYNOUS! FEMININE IS AWESOME, STRONG AND POWERFUL! MARRIAGE IS A PARTNERSHIP AND REAL MEN ARE GETTING SOME WHILE YOU SIT LIKE A TURD STINKING UP!
And here I thought this'd be Davey J whining about the age of consent, turns out to be more sexist nonsense.
"People often defecate on themselves in the courtroom"
Did... did Davey J shit himself in court?
"...what about a man's right to expect his wife to cook, clean and care for the children? What about a man's right to sex on demand? The courts don't enforce a man's right to have a responsible, submissive and obedient wife. If a man works and the wife is at home with the children, she ought to cook for her husband. He has a right to expect a homecooked meal and a clean house. "
Who cooks and cleans? That's a thing a couple decides between themselves. There is no "right" for sex on demand, and any man who tried that line with me would be looking for a long, cold winter sleeping alone on the sofa. Nobody has a "right" to tell me to be submissive and obedient, repeat, nobody! Davey, we understand why you want some frightened, uncertain adolescent, because no adult woman would put up with a demand list like that. That's basically the manifesto of the divorced man, who wonders why he can't find a replacement doormat.
Women won't go along with that. The judicial system won't enforce your preference list. Somewhere along the line, hasn't it ever occurred to you that YOU are the problem?
People often defecate on themselves in the courtroom
Did you make that up, or are you projecting again?
Ok, but now what about a man's right to expect his wife to cook, clean and care for the children? What about a man's right to sex on demand? The courts don't enforce a man's right to have a responsible, submissive and obedient wife.
These aren't "rights." But the first sentence is completely reasonable if you take out "his wife."
"but now what about a man's right to expect his wife to cook, clean and care for the children?"
If that is all you want, don't get married, hire a cook and a maid. A spouse is a partner, not a domestic slave.
"What about a man's right to sex on demand?"
There isn't any. You can't demand sex from anybody just as nobody can demand it from you. You might find yourself in trouble with the law if you ever forced yourself on somebody, no matter who they are
"The courts don't enforce a man's right to have a responsible, submissive and obedient wife"
Because those aren't things courts have any jurisdiction over. If you want those things in a wife good luck finding sonebody like that you can lord over, but the law doesn't say anybody HAS to act like that for you, even if you do marry them
"People often defecate on themselves in the courtroom"
I haven't heard of any such cases, but if they did, it's probably because they spent the night drinking hand sanitizer.
What I have seen in divorce court is a woman ordered to pay support for her alcoholic husband because she supported him while they were married. I'm curious to know what Davey thinks a man should do if his "helpmeet" becomes disabled and can't cook, clean or have sex any more. My guess is he'd "Gingrich" her.
...just pay the fucking alimony & child support already, David J. Pedo.
Don't thinly veil it with all this bollocks.
Because dressing up as Batman and 'protesting' on the roof of Guam's court building would help in furthering your 'cause', I'm sure. [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]
...you can try if you think it would help. You'd look a complete tit in the process, but I doubt your ex. would know about it on the mainland.
And she - as well as your daughter - being as far away as possible is the best decision she's made. It made up for her initial mistake: marrying a fundie nonce like you.
Now fork out the ca$h and like it, Davey-boy.
image
You wouldn't want to end up in court again , would you?
Bring your brown trousers.
"The courts don't enforce a man's right to have a responsible, submissive and obedient wife."
You mean the right that doesn't exist?
What about a man's right to sex on demand?
Why should such a right exist? After all, as you have told us countless of times, sex is evil.
"When people no longer care about the Holy Bible, all sense of fairness and doing the right thing are gone!"
Then why has crime gone down?
The courts view what I just said as a form of domestic abuse!
If there is a just God, then one day he will let Brother David wake up as a woman and make him stay that way. His/her views would most probably experience an extreme metamorphosis.
But alas, there is no God, just or otherwise, so David will remain the prick he is until the end of his days.
... The guy who got off with community service and what amounts to an extended stay at the beach for sexual interference with a minor is complaining about the harshness of the penal system?
Then again, you don't think pater familicide is a crime.
What is it with DJS and not understanding how the court system works? You'd think if anyone could distinguish between civil and criminal law it'd be a divorced convicted felon.
America's law enforcement system has become over-reactive due to the feminist agenda.
I'm gonna go all broad-stereotype here, but most of the people I've met or seen speaking who I've pegged in my mind as feminists, I would guess that they're mostly in favor of more lenient sentencing and lower prison populations.
The courts are over-reactive. Judges are often harsh, cruel and unjust. ... Prison sentences are extremely long and unfair. Numerous private prison owners have lobbied lawmakers to greatly lengthen prison sentences, which means much more money for “the system.”
I've heard this all before, and I won't deny that there's probably some corruption, but our political decisions have shown, time and again, that in this nation the public supports a stronger, harsher justice system. And there are reasons for that. The last time we had a weaker criminal justice system we also had a lot more crime. We can debate how strong the connection between the two is, but the bottom line is that people are afraid of what might happen if we're more lenient. Also...
People often defecate on themselves in the courtroom, because of cruel judges who have no respect for others.
Yeah, I'm gonna call "says who?" on that.
The courts view what I just said as a form of domestic abuse!
That's because it is domestic abuse, Davie.
You know, there's a word for a woman who comes into your house and cleans it and cooks your meals. It's "maid". And if you want to find a nice cleaning service to give your money to, and wrap everything up in a nice invoice and contract so that if they don't do what they promised, you can sue, be my guest! But don't delude yourself that marriage works like that.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.