“Interesting that those so invested in evolution have such a lack of understanding about the theory.”
Oh, DO tell!
“It is not politically correct toward homosexuals, women or various racial groups.”
I, uh, think you’re full of shit.
Political Correctness is an effort to prevent accidental offense. If evolutionary research actually has evidence that homosexuality, for example, is incorrect, then that’s the science. No insult intended, though people may TAKE off3nse.
First of all, though, you need to understand that it’s gene pools that evolve, not individuals? As long as the species gains some benefit from gay mambers, then it’s perfectly reasonable for it to develop and to be retained in the gene pool for as long as it helps.
And homosexuality shows up in too many species around the biosphere to be a mistake.
I have no idea why you think evolution would be offensive to women. You probably misunderstand the title of Darwin’s book about “.,..the favored races.” There, he’s talking about species, not Caucasians. And that’s just another way of saying ‘survival of the fittest species.’
“A tenant of Christianity
Tenet, I’m sure you mean, you illiterate fool.
“ is that race and ethnicity are not indicators of salvation and so only trivial distinctions. Just an observation.”
And how many slave owners in the Old South were, or at least thought they were, Christains?
How many of teh South’s politicians that seceded in order to preserve the right to own slaves were Christains?
Juuuuuuuuuuuuuuust a teensy bit full if it. Just an observation.
