Yes, I think 2 or more penises would absolutely provide a selective advantage.....so why not, evos?
108 comments
Hmm. Shall we give Supersport a few links to some nice tentacle-porn, and let him answer his own question?
(Efrain)
No, actually he's trying to be cute by using this term "evos" as short for "evolutionists" (I highly doubt that someone with a double-digit IQ like Supersport would even know who Eros is). As I've pointed out before, though, unless he's using the term "evo" to talk about a Mitsubishi Lancer, the word is as meaningless as his arguments themselves.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I am the missing link.
.. and by that, I mean that I have 1 and a half penises.
Because it's pointless? Because as we're built, breeding with more than one mate isn't plausible? Because diverting the flow of semen between two penii (Is that the word...?) roughly halves the amount of semen between each ejaculation, hampering the reproductive process? Because in some cases, men have a hard enough time getting enough blood to ONE penis to get it hard, let alone two?
Because it's unnecessary and no, it doesn't provide a selective advantage. One penis gets reproduction done just fine. Having two or more is just a waste of proteins and energy to maintain. Not to mention that once you have more penises you then have to spend even more resources to produce enough sperm and semen so every penis can ejaculate.
In short, no it doesn't provide a selective advantage and yes you are an idiot.
With over 6 billion people on the planet, I think one penis isn;t much of a disadvantage.
Besides, mine is the equivolent of two!
Sorry...I'll get my coat.
Ahh supersport, where would I get my bi-weekly dose of mindnumbing stupidity without you?
You rock!, just not in a good way.
For the same reason I've only got one printer:
Because I only NEED one, and I would need twice as much space and twice as much power to maintain two.
"Yes, I think 2 or more penises would absolutely provide a selective advantage"
What you or anyone "thinks" is an evolutionary advantage is irrelevant (which is why Eugenics fails hard). Oh and why not? Because it either hasn't occurred yet in humans or it already occurred and was bred out.
Ah Supersport, nobody fails all branches of science on the same scale as you.
Because one erection takes blood away from the brain. In a small brained human, two or more hard-ons at once could cause passout, seizures or in extremely small brained humans- death! Be afraid Supersport- be very afraid!
supersport obviously hasnt had sex.
Needed help getting them up though, lol.
Depends whether they're side to side or one above the other.
If they're one over the other than that would be more useful than side to side.
Also, can they get hard independently or are they linked in their arousal?
I think we ought to be told...
only if there were two or more vaginas. That said, after several pints of beer, it's hard enough finding the first one.
EDIT: Reminds me of a phrase "I'm happier than a dog with two cocks"
It's silly, even if they were average size it would be a pain in the ass to get them erect.
Why? Blood son, dem' blood.
Clearly, you're wrong. That's why not, and I don't give a damn if its circular. The argument, not the penis, I mean.
No, actually, it wouldn't. See, women only have one vagina a piece. So, having two penises wouldn't really matter, now, would it?
Of course, since you haven't seen a naked woman since birth, I can understand your lack of knowledge.
Actually, the mushroom shape of the human penis has been discovered to work well as a sort of plunger, drawing out a previous males semen so it can be replaced with your own. Having two peni would mean there would be a gap in the seal, so there wouldn't be any suction to create this effect. As such, having two peni would actually be a disadvantage to breeding for polygamist apes, and since humans evolved from them it applies for us too.
Does he not get that people who support evolution don't actually cause it?
Also, there ARE men in the world with two penises. So, supersport, as always, loses.
Actually, there are pictures of men with 2 penises, but I dont see the advantage. One penis can impregnate a women just as easily as 2. Besides, having 2 penises may make you an outcast where women do not want to copulate with you. I can only see negative effects for this.
If we needed two we'd probably have them
check out snakes. they have two dicks, one on either side, so he can get jiggy regardless of whether the snake chick is on his left or right side.
I am not making this up.
furthermore, pig dicks are shaped like corkscrews
I LOVE NATURE
The fundie thinks two penises would provide a selective advantage. Quickly, apply the not operator to that to find the truth. What, it works? MAGIC! I AM MAGIC! I PROVED GOD! Oh wait, that makes me fundie. Apply the not operator to what I just said. It's perfectly normal.
"Yes, I think 2 or more penises would absolutely provide a selective advantage.....so why not, evos?"
image
If a couple of Chavs had 'Twocked'* a rally-bred car made by Mitsubishi, then you would have an Evo with two dicks, and I'll just go get my coat, shall I...?!
X3
*- 'TWOCK' for the uninitiated:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=twock
@Darwin
"Let's hope that supersport never marries Carico, the resultant explosion of stupidity would devastate the entire Alpha quadrant."
Infinitely worse than what unstable Omega molecules can do, re. interstellar travel.
http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Omega_molecule
[/nerd]
@ #885227
Reminds me of an old joke about a guy who had one like that. Poor bastard searched all his life until he finally met a woman with a corkscrew vagina, and it turned out she had a left-handed thread!
If Supersport had two dicks he could use both hands to whack 'em . . . but who'd hold the magazine?
"I think 2 or more penises would absolutely provide a selective advantage"
You know that evolutionary science doesn't work that way, right? We aren't trying to anticipate how we will evolve, but to understand how everything DID evolve.
So, for those creatures that did evolve to have multiple penii, we would appreciate your efforts to explain this selective advantage, so maybe we can understand how they DID evolve.
but I suspect your 'I think' is not entirely sincere, and you're just mocking 'evos' and their theories.
Plus, not every trait that evolves has to provide an advantage. We could also have traits that merely are not disadvantages.
Yes, I think 2 or more penises would absolutely provide a selective advantage.....so why not, evos?
As far as I understand it, sex is a pretty involved process, to the point where humans are only really capable of having a good hardcore fuck a few times a day. How would you even use multiple dicks?
I was always under the impression that the main bottlenecks in human reproduction, historically, have been the ability to attract mates, the available food, and the available space; that is, we're K-strategists. Organisms that are limited by reproduction rate, like flowers and bugs, do have a reproductive system that can dump as much sperms as possible without abjectly wasting it. Humans don't.
Ask the spiders with their two penis-bones. They sometimes tear one penis-bone off and throw it at the much larger female. The ones with just one penis-bone are more successful. Can't remember if it was success in procreation or in survival, though... (Saw it on a QI show on BBC Brit.)
In humans, I'd say few women would want to have group-sex with one man trying to "service" many women at a time (we all know how "good" men in general are at multi-tasking*...). I know I want it to be more intimate than that, and as I'm almost 50 and infertile, the evolutionary advantage is a moot point for me.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
